1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stells [14]
3 years ago
14

Think about a time when you failed to notice something around you because your attention was focused elsewhere. If someone point

ed it out, were you surprised that you hadn’t noticed it right away?
Social Studies
1 answer:
arlik [135]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Human focus and attention can sometimes be easily lost, especially when distracted by certain stimuli, like phones. When that happens, it is not abnormal for situations to happen because our senses, and brains, were not one hundred percent focused on our surroundings and what was happening around us. This division of attention, or loss of focus, may result in fatal, or pretty severe consequences.

There was this time when I was walking down the street, at first paying full attention to all my surroundings. The pedestrian walkway was cluttered with people and with literal bumps and holes in it. But, since I was paying attention to where I was going, I knew I could manouver without a problem. However, at some point my phone pinged and of course, I took it out. At that moment, my senses, and especially my brain, became distracted, and now I was only half paying attention to the road, and half to my cellphone. I did not realize that as I was walking, I was coming close to the dividing edge between the street and the pedestrian walkway, and if it had not been for a woman behind me who saw me and realized what was going on, I might have stepped out into the street and gotten hit by an oncoming car. To say the least, I was more than shocked and ever since I have not taken my cellphone out as I walk, even if someone is caling me or texting me. I know that I would have never gotten to that situation if I had been first focusing on walking and then, as I arrived at a safe place, texted the other person.

You might be interested in
WILL MARK BRAINLIST!!!
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

Usually Nobility.

Explanation:

Farmers and Peasants typically lived outside the cities. And well, the gods didn't really live in the cities.

8 0
3 years ago
what were the reasons that led ashmark to this situation? what were some of the short- term and long-term issues with the red st
laiz [17]

Ashmark upped their support for Red Star and dispatched a crew of maintenance workers to operate on the site and keep the foundry running. Additionally, Ashmark supported Red Star financially by making weekly loans.

What is your knowledge of Redstar and Ashmark?

Red Star, Ashmark's supplier, was a Tier 11 company, while Ashmark was a Tier 1 company that sold car engine components. As a result, this provided Red Star hope and support to carry on with its business by paying for payroll and aluminium imports, but in the end, creditors seized the accounts after Ashmark had sent the weekly operational cash.

To know more about Ashmark click on the link below:

brainly.com/question/14598580

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
An American leader who opposed the French Revolution was George Washington. Samuel Adams. Thomas Jefferson. Napoleon Bonaparte.
jeka57 [31]
The answer to your question is George washington
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which claim is not defensible?
Vadim26 [7]

A claim which is not defensible is saying that: D. George W. Bush is not as talented as his father, George H. W. Bush.

<h3>What is a claim?</h3>

A claim simply refers to a statement that is used by a writer or speaker to prove, substantiate, defend and support an argument. Thus, it's an assertive statement that is expressed by a writer, so as to prove that an argument is either true or real.

In this scenario, an indefensible claim is saying that George W. Bush is not as talented as his father, George H. W. Bush because it is actually a proven statement of fact.

Read more on claims here: brainly.com/question/22676015

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
The role of the pubic information officer A. includes reporting to the Operations Section Chief during an incident response. B.
ella [17]

Answer: A. includes reporting to the Operations Section Chief during an incident response

Explanation: A public information officer could be explained as a individual who is charges with the responsibility of ensuring the passage of required information between government stakeholders and the public. The public information officer mainly sits in between the top government stakeholders and the media in other to ensure seamless information transfer between the public and the necessary quarters of government.

The function of a public information officer also includes gathering information about the cause of a certain incident or scenario, reporting the narrative of the incident to the head of section as gathered, then relay the outcome to the media and general public.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • He ability to expand short term memory by linking ideas and concepts together is called
    10·1 answer
  • Which crime triggered the Watergate scandal?
    7·2 answers
  • Humans are subject to the same limiting factors as other populations. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T
    15·2 answers
  • Where would you walk a person from abroad in Romania?
    13·1 answer
  • Which letter on the map represents the Sahara Desert? A) A B) B C) C D) D
    10·2 answers
  • Explain how ultrasound is able to produce images of body structures
    5·2 answers
  • During Washington's presidency, where did Little Turtle and Blue Jacket lead raids against American settlers?
    11·2 answers
  • Please help 10 points plus brain
    13·2 answers
  • Please read
    7·1 answer
  • Extrinsic rewards: ________
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!