The reason that does not make a case for the value of proposed solution is that "it is effective in solving the problems." As always, the simplest explanation is the usually the best solution. This reasoning is lined with principle of plurality and the principle of parsimony.
Answer:
Please ask questions that make more sense!
Explanation:
Answer:
an attitude about the story's events or characters
Explanation:
The increase in the interest of the readers lies entirely on the narrator's way of storytelling. It is the narrator's attitude towards his characters and the plot that helps the readers to establish a constant connection between them. The wittier or smarter the characters, the more they hold the readers. The narrator's personalities highlighted in his characters helps in building a constant interest among the readers. The uniqueness of the characters and the method of storytelling are the advanced characteristics of a good narrator.
Answer:
Counterclaim definition
Explanation:
Ex.
The bank sued me for not paying back unpaid debt, but I sued them back for fraud.
<em>Counter; </em>to punish
<em>Claim;</em> something said that is NOT 100% true all the time.
Answer:
The ironic part is where it says "thought we were going to have to get on without you, tessie"
Explanation:
This only becomes ironic after the reader has finished with the story and can understand what has happened because at the end Tessie "wins" the lottery.
