Answer:
a) For this case we have the linear model given:
![P(t) = 223.89 e^{0.1979t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20P%28t%29%20%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979t%7D)
And we want to see the fit to the model so we can calculate the value for the model and the difference respect to the observed value.
![t=0, P(0)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*0}= 223.89 , e= |216.8-223.89|=7.09](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D0%2C%20P%280%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A0%7D%3D%20223.89%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C216.8-223.89%7C%3D7.09)
![t=1, P(1)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*1}= 272.89 , e= |256.6-272.89|=16.29](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D1%2C%20P%281%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A1%7D%3D%20272.89%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C256.6-272.89%7C%3D16.29)
![t=2, P(2)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*2}=332.60 , e= |361.6-332.60|=29.00](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D2%2C%20P%282%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A2%7D%3D332.60%20%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C361.6-332.60%7C%3D29.00)
![t=3, P(3)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*3}= 405.39 , e= |425.8-405.39|=20.41](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D3%2C%20P%283%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A3%7D%3D%20405.39%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C425.8-405.39%7C%3D20.41)
![t=4, P(4)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*4}= 494.11 , e= |481.6-494.11|=12.51](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D4%2C%20P%284%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A4%7D%3D%20494.11%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C481.6-494.11%7C%3D12.51)
As we can see the model not perfect fits to the data but the residuals are not to higher compared to the real values.
b)
c) ![t=15, P(15)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*15}= 4357.505](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D15%2C%20P%2815%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A15%7D%3D%204357.505)
As we can see the difference between the two models is higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we have the following data:
x=t y=P(t)
0 216.8
1 256.6
2 361.6
3 425.8
4 481.6
5 602.0
6 729.8
7 912.0
8 1102.9
9 1280.3
Where x represent the year, with t = 0 corresponding to 2000
Part a
For this case we have the linear model given:
![P(t) = 223.89 e^{0.1979t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20P%28t%29%20%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979t%7D)
And we want to see the fit to the model so we can calculate the value for the model and the difference respect to the observed value.
![t=0, P(0)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*0}= 223.89 , e= |216.8-223.89|=7.09](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D0%2C%20P%280%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A0%7D%3D%20223.89%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C216.8-223.89%7C%3D7.09)
![t=1, P(1)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*1}= 272.89 , e= |256.6-272.89|=16.29](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D1%2C%20P%281%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A1%7D%3D%20272.89%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C256.6-272.89%7C%3D16.29)
![t=2, P(2)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*2}=332.60 , e= |361.6-332.60|=29.00](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D2%2C%20P%282%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A2%7D%3D332.60%20%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C361.6-332.60%7C%3D29.00)
![t=3, P(3)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*3}= 405.39 , e= |425.8-405.39|=20.41](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D3%2C%20P%283%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A3%7D%3D%20405.39%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C425.8-405.39%7C%3D20.41)
![t=4, P(4)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*4}= 494.11 , e= |481.6-494.11|=12.51](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D4%2C%20P%284%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A4%7D%3D%20494.11%20%2C%20e%3D%20%7C481.6-494.11%7C%3D12.51)
As we can see the model not perfect fits to the data but the residuals are not to higher compared to the real values.
Part b
For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:
Where:
So we can find the sums like this:
With these we can find the sums:
And the slope would be:
Nowe we can find the means for x and y like this:
And we can find the intercept using this:
So the line would be given by:
Part c
![t=15, P(15)= 223.89 e^{0.1979*15}= 4357.505](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20t%3D15%2C%20P%2815%29%3D%20223.89%20e%5E%7B0.1979%2A15%7D%3D%204357.505)
As we can see the difference between the two models is higher.