The question is somehow incomplete but the answer is it in
the inferential stage of probability-based inference. It is in
complex networks of codependent variables is an lively theme in statistical
research, encouraged by such varied presentations as predicting, pedigree examination
and troubleshooting.
Answer:
There is one possible solution
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, we want to get the number of solutions
We can proceed to solve the equation
we have two y values so we can directly equate the x parts
-2x - 4 = 3x + 3
3x + 2x = -3-4
5x = -7
x = -7/5
To get y, we substitute
We can only get one value of y too
So we have a point (x,y) as the solution to the system of equations
k = 13The smallest zero or root is x = -10
===============================
Steps:
note: you can write "x^2" to mean "x squared"
f(x) = x^2+3x-10
f(x+5) = (x+5)^2+3(x+5)-10 ... replace every x with x+5
f(x+5) = (x^2+10x+25)+3(x+5)-10
f(x+5) = x^2+10x+25+3x+15-10
f(x+5) = x^2+13x+30
Compare this with x^2+kx+30 and we see that k = 13
Factor and solve the equation below
x^2+13x+30 = 0
(x+10)(x+3) = 0
x+1 = 0 or x+3 = 0
x = -10 or x = -3
The smallest zero is x = -10 as its the left-most value on a number line.
Please mark brainliest
<em><u>Hope this helps.</u></em>
3x-15+2x-2
=5x-17
use the distribution property
Answer:
16.629
Step-by-step explanation:
Start by setting up the numbers like the first picture. The borrow. To borrow we have to go the whole way over to the 7 since you can't borrow from 0. So the 7 becomes a 6 and the 0 becomes 10. Then the 10 becomes a 9 and the 0 becomes a 10. Then the 10 becomes a 9 and the 3 becomes a 13. Then subtract. Just bring the decimal point down.
