Betty Friedan's argument in <em>The feminine mystique</em> (1963) is made from the point of view of psychology and sociology through the analysis of surveys and interviews with women. Friedan was trying to explain why the surveys showed women were unhappy in their domestic lives.
The author found that women being educated to believe that domestic life should be their primary objective made women feel worthless.
This education for a domestic life happened through family, school, college, and media. There weren't many places women could get out of this destiny.
They felt worthless because a domestic life by itself doesn't provide a sense of realization and accomplishment. That's why, according to Friedan, it was so common to see women seeking fulfillment through community projects and the like.
<em>The feminine mystique</em> was a bestseller and one of the starters of the second-wave feminism in the 60s.
Answer:
By using deficit spending
Explanation:
An explosion of new technological and artistic innovations that far surpassed anything previously created, which impacted all humans caused by the development of language
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) oversaw an economic and social campaign known as the Great Leap Forward (Second Five Year Plan) in the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1958 to 1962. Through the establishment of people's communes, CCP Chairman Mao Zedong began the effort to transform the nation from an agriculture - based economy into a communist society. Mao ruled that more should be done to enhance grain production and introduce industry to the rural. Local authorities fought to meet or exceed quotas that were based on Mao's overstated promises out of fear of anti-Rightist campaigns, collecting fictitious "surpluses," and abandoning farmers to starve to death. Higher authorities were afraid to speak out about the economic catastrophe these policies were causing.
To know more about great leap forward refer to brainly.com/question/2530840
#SPJ4
Answer:
Expressing anti war viewpoints
Explanation:
This was actually created BEFORE WW2 and the United States wasn’t concerned about German speech. However, this act was specifically made so that people did not outwardly speak against the war. A lot of people agree that this is against the 1st amendment, however it is still debated.
Hope that helps!!!
Answer:A
Explanation: because I did before