1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiks02 [169]
3 years ago
6

17. A personal and individual relationship with God is called a

History
1 answer:
Ilya [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: is a vocation

Explanation: Vocation is one’s response to a call from beyond oneself to use one’s strengths and gifts to make the world a better place through service, creativity, and leadership.

A call from beyond oneself.

The concept of vocation rests on the belief that life is about more than me. To speak of “vocation” or “calling” is to suggest that my life is a response to something beyond myself. Christians believe this “something beyond myself” is God. But even people outside of this tradition often sense a call to serve others, to create beauty, and to do good in the world. A call may be experienced in many ways, including the following:

A sense that God is leading me to a particular task, relationship, or mission.

A deep desire to get involved when I am confronted with the needs of others.

A sense that a particular task or kind of work is what I am supposed to be doing with my life at this particular time.

Personal fulfilment that I experience as I am involved in a particular task or work.

The affirmation of others who recognize the work I am doing and the contributions I am making to the world.

You might be interested in
Identify and explain two differences between capitalism and communism.
Sonja [21]

Answer:

System of government and how property is owned

Explanation:

Capitalism involves a democratic government while communism involves a totalitarian government. Usually, capitalist governmetns are laissez-faire. Property is privately owned in capitalist society while in communist society it is owned by the state.

4 0
3 years ago
Martin luther king jr.'s assassin, james earl ray, was captured at the airport in which city?
skelet666 [1.2K]
It was an airport in the city of London, the United Kingdom that King's assassin, James Earl Ray, was captured. In fact, he was captured during June 8, 1968, at the Heathrow Airport as he was going to depart at that time. Martin Luther King Jr. has been one of the advocates of civil rights movement in the United States,
6 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. Both Catholics and Protestants considered the by Heinrich Kramer and Jacob S
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Both Catholics and Protestants considered the Malleus Maleficarum (also known as <em>Hammer of Witches</em>) by Heinrich Kramer and Jacob Sprenger as an authoritative work on witchcraft.

This 1487-book it is considered by many as the most famous work of witchcraft ever written during.  The book became an important source for Protestants and Catholics during the "fight" against witchcraft during the Inquisition.  



5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“Caught in the street by the truant Officer, or by the agents of the Children’s Societies, peddling, perhaps, or begging, to hel
Blababa [14]

Answer:

The living situation in slums was bad and an unhealthy environment especially for children.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Living in a bad situation indicates that the people need some resources and supplies for their families. Boys should handle this tough situation in serving their families.

So they loitering in the streets resulted in being captured by police and they will be sent to the reformatory. This reformatory suited for the people having a negative mind and it doesn't improve the lives of young people.

4 0
3 years ago
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A goal of the Glorious Revolution was to​
    9·3 answers
  • What were the unia views on american society?
    14·1 answer
  • What created democracy in New England
    11·2 answers
  • Match each colonial government with it's contribution to the US Contsitution.
    9·1 answer
  • Which two countries did NOT ally with each other prior to World War I?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the main idea behind President Roosevelt's Four Freedoms speech?
    8·1 answer
  • What is king menes known for accomplishing​
    9·2 answers
  • Roe v. Wade is a good example of Group of answer choices judicial activism because it was based on a constitutional right to pri
    7·1 answer
  •  <br><br> Someone please help this is due tonight and I’m in need of help
    13·1 answer
  • This scene develops the theme that gender roles are unimportant when
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!