It is important to Learn, and Write down Results/Notes.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that:
"FALSE." <span>Accounts in non-depository institutions are almost always insured by the government.
</span>"FALSE." All financial institutions are equally safe and <span>beneficial to use.
"TRUE." </span><span> Financial experts recommend that you compare at least several different financial institutions in your area and find the one that best meets your needs.
"TRUE." </span><span>Personal financial planning is the process of creating and achieving financial goals
"FALSE." </span><span>Shared decision-making is always a positive strategy to take</span>
Answer:
easy i fk ow how to die dofbe hahaha eituw gutny
<u>Answer:</u> Option 1 and Option 5
<u>Explanation:</u>
In mixed economies under the government regulation most of the production is done by private ownership. There is very little government intervention. The main aim of the government intervention is to make sure that the private business activities comply with the law of the country.
Another result of government regulation is to control the externalities created by these business structures. Government ensures there is no externality which affects the market as well as the people. Due to these regulations there is no advantages for producer or government. Also the markets cannot be controlled with these regulations in mixed market economy.
