Answer:
Endorsing a presidential candidate is more likely to be done by a national party than a local party.
Explanation:
This is because when it's local, it's usually in support of local elected officials. It has nothing to do with national officials. However, when it is a national party, they could endorse a presidential candidate because that is ultimately more important and affects all people- hence the national. This is because whoever is chosen in such an important election changes the future of a country, and is something national organizations should deal with- not local ones.
Beliefs are the convictions that people hold to be true. The beliefs that we hold are an important part of our identity. Beliefs are precious because they reflect who we are and how we live our life’s.
The statement ‘Processing information while learning something new can
occur without demonstration of behavior’ is true. Learning information can be
verbally (through speaking), visually (through diagrams , pictures, etc.) or by
hearing.
The evidence for the claim that campaign money buys influence and elected officials ignore voters to please donors is tenuous.
<h3>What is a tenuous claim?</h3>
This is the type of claim that people make that cannot be said to be strong, definite of have been made sure of. People just make these types of claims based on the things that they think even though it may not exactly be true.
The claim that campaign money buys influence is tenuous based on the fact that the claim has not being tested to be true. It was just made by the people without any concrete information that would serve as pointers for the reason for such a speech.
Read more on claim here: brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
