Answer:
The given statement is False
Explanation:
Amazon is the largest river and a great drainage system in South America. Two thirds of the river is located in Brazil.
It possesses the great and opulent bio diversity and the waters inhabit more than two thousand kinds of marine creatures. It has been a great foundation of protein abundance for the local populace and also a basis of fresh water. Due to soil erosion the nutrients in the river gets exhausted but the decomposed animals and plants serve to be the compost for the growth of new plant and animal species.
This is called nutrient recycling. Piranha, Giant River Otter, blue dolphins and electric eel are some of the species found in the river. It originates in Peru. It drains through nine American countries.
The correct answer to this question would be British Columbia. A simple reason why this is such is because they share a similar climate to a certain extent due to which a similar type of growth has developed. This has lead to big similarities between the Northwestern US and between British Columbia in terms of the landscapes of both regions.
Answer: Well the railroads made it possible for urban cities to get food and fuel other needed materials.
Explanation: When railroads came in it allowed more things to come and go through cities making it perfect for distributing needed goods for the people who lived there and nearby.
Answer: D) Sacrifice the soundness of a decision in order to achieve interpersonal harmony
Explanation: Group thinking involves more and more diverse suggestions for solving a problem, as there are multiple different attitudes and views within the group. It can also mean many different possible solutions, so the option to choose the best ones. There may also be a situation where the objective best solution is often not chosen in order to reach a compromise among the members of the group, because in the group one must always count on vanities and egos. It can also lead to slow and often ineffective decision making until all the solutions offered are reviewed. However, the worst-case scenario is to intentionally sacrifice the right solution for the sake of interpersonal harmony. This means that the group essentially did not meet to find the best solution, but to treat the excessive vanities and egos of its members.