Answer:
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn no
Explanation:
This is a question that may be different for everyone.
So, let's say you live in New York City in 1910. What are some of the pros and cons of living in a city compared to the country?
Pros:
-Access to running water
-Closer to doctors and hospitals (which weren't very helpful back then, anyways, but that's a whole different thing)
-More jobs
-More jobs that weren't physically involved
-Near latest technology
-More food
-More luxuries
Cons:
-Disease spreads faster in close conditions
-Losing ability over millenia of farming, and becoming more modern
-Being poor is relatively common
Now, think about modern-day NYC. Why would you want to live there instead of out in the country?
Now, imagine yourself as an early human. There are more opportunities, etc. Why would you want to live in a city vs. the country?
Comparing time periods is a helpful exercise when looking at history, so I helped the NYC example helped with your perspective :)
Struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.
Further Explanation:
Worcester v. Georgia was the case of 1832 of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Renounce the conviction of Worcester. Supreme Court also held that any land of America without the license by the state to be considered as unconstitutional. It built up doctrine of tribal sovereignty. The ruling laid out a strong relationship between the Indian nations and the USA. John Marshall said that the character of the USA government is federal. Indian states would not be given any authority in the American Indian affairs. Thus Georgia statute is unconstitutional. The ruling was given to avoid the political conflict of the court and the executive. The ruling had ordered for Worcester to be free and they complied to the order several months later. Later in 1833 the new governor Wilson Lumpkin gave the order to pardon Worcester if they stop their activities in the Cherokee. Worcester and Butler complied to the order and they both were set free. Worcester came to the Indian Territory when Cherokee removal was on trial in 1836. Worcester joined his ministry back and translated the bible backing to Cherokee. The first printing press was established in the USA that worked with Cherokee for publishing the newspaper. There are several treaties between the USA government and the Cherokee.
Learn more:
1. Compare and contrast lifestyle choices that positively affect physical fitness with those that negatively affect physical fitness.
<u>brainly.com/question/951060
</u>
2. Discuss why a physically active job does not guarantee better physical fitness.
<u>brainly.com/question/1617174
</u>
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia
Subject: Social Science
Keywords: Conviction, license, unconstitutional, American Indian affairs, political conflict, new governor, Wilson Lumpkin, first printing press.
Answer: E. All of the above.
Explanation:
Lisa state here classifies her in all segment. Firstly, she's expectant and that's one of the requirements for the WIC for women which are pregnant. Secondly, she is a low income pregnant woman who's child is not up to 5years old and that's another requirement for the WIC loan, and finally the loan is for all children up to 5years and new mothers, she has a child and is a single mother.
This is known as NULL HYPOTHESIS.
In a statistical set, a null hypothesis is an hypothesis which states that there is no significant difference between specified data set. Null hypothesis is typically used to propose that no significant difference exist in a given set of observation.
