Answer:
Easy
Explanation:
In psychology, the term temperament refers to the aspects of our personality we are born with.
According to many psychologists such as Thomas and Chess there are three main types of temperament: easy, difficult and slow to warm up.
- Easy temperament: these babies <u>adapt easily</u> to new situations and they have <u>regular routines</u> and in general they are <u>cheerful</u> and have a positive mood.
- Difficult temperament: These babies don't adapt as easily to new situations, have irregular routines and have a negative mood. They tend to cry a lot.
- Slow-to-warm-up temperament: They are slow to adapt to new things and have a low level of energy. They are usually catalogued as shy babies.
In this example, Bindy <u>has regular routines, is cheerful and easy to adapt to new situations. </u>We can see that according to what we said before, she would be classified as an Easy child.
Answer:
B. a shift towards expansionism
Explanation:
Explanation:
The witness's testimony is inadmissible.
Under Federal Rule 804(b)(1), the testimony of a witness who is unavailable, given at another hearing, is admissible in a subsequent trial if there is sufficient similarity of parties and issues so that the opportunity to develop testimony or cross-examination at the prior hearing was meaningful.
The former testimony is admissible upon any trial of the same subject matter. The party against whom the testimony is offered or, in civil cases, the party's predecessor in interest must have been a party in the former action. "Predecessor in interest" includes one in a privity relationship with the party, such as grantor-grantee, testator-executor, life tenant-remainder man, and joint tenants.
These requirements are intended to ensure that the party against whom the testimony is offered (or a predecessor in interest in a civil case) had an adequate opportunity and motive to cross-examine the witness.
In the civil suit here at issue, the survivors of the victim were not parties to the criminal case, nor were they in privity with any such party. (The parties to that case were the defendant and the government.) These survivors, who are the plaintiffs in the instant litigation, are the parties against whom the testimony of the witness is being offered. Because they were not parties to the action in which the witness testified, they had no opportunity to cross-examine him. Even if the government had a similar motive to cross-examine the witness as do the plaintiffs in the current action, that is not sufficient to make the government a predecessor in interest to the plaintiffs. Consequently, the testimony of the witness does not come within the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, and the testimony is inadmissible hearsay.
A victim and his former business.
One difference between the psychologists and the psychiatrists is that due to their different training, all the psychiatrists but not all the psychologists can prescribe medication. This might be different from state to state, but generally psychologists focus on the psychotherapy.
Answer:
Religion has immensely shaped the cultural landacape. In terms of belief and certain practices, it is unequivocally believed that religion has done more good in the lives of people by making them jettison some fetish lifestyle which was stylishly affecting their health.
In some part of Africa, when the husband of a woman died and the kinsmen somehow believe it wasn't a timely death, certain traditional practices like bathing the corpse pouring some of the water he was bathed with into a calabash and given to the woman to drink to clear herself from the accusation has been abolished by Christian religion. Such practice is very dangerous to health as bacteria from the dead body which has stayed for days is been transferred to the woman.
Secondly, architecturally, the structures today as religion has come into villages of the world has changed. Living in bushes, mud houses meant for the gods of the land in those days has been abolished. People live comfortable in a well built house today.
In giving names to kids, no one gives devilish meaningless names to their kids because religion has taught it brings bad luck to the innocent born child. Religion made it known that the name of a person has a clear effect in his life and lifetime. Therefore, unfortunate names are no more given to new born.:
