Atherosclerosis is developed in the cardiovascular system.
Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Answer:
hey I am not sure but I think the fourth option is the answer, property tax
The correct answer is D. In both regions, Mongols allowed the previous administrators to continue to rule.
In both Persia and Russia, the Mongols had a regional governor, and to help them they recruited staff among the local population, they usually recruited people that came from lettered families and by hereditary basis. Historians have pointed out that Russians were trained by the Mongols to take orders, to pay taxes and to supply soldiers without delay, future czars also used the same techniques later on.
This caused the population to feel “part of the power” and this way they would be against a revolt for example. It was also a way of being closer to the population by taking some of them to work with the new “government”.
Answer:
The correct answer is B, "the division of government into legislative, executive, and judicial branches."
Explanation:
Those are the 3 branches that power was divided into.
