Answer:
<u>Option B</u> must pay him as an employee, withhold appropriate taxes and issue a W-2 at year end
Explanation: He is paid based on hours worked, and uses the company equipment thus is an employee who is controlled by an employer. The independent contractors buy their own supplies, provide their own equipment and paid based on tasks performed
Answer:
The correct answer is option b.
Explanation:
When foreign producers sell their goods and services in the US market they get US dollars in return. They use these dollars to buy goods and services from the US.
If import restrictions prohibit foreigners from selling various goods and services in the U.S. market, foreigners will have fewer U.S. dollars which they can spend to buy U.S. goods and services. So they will be able to purchase fewer goods and services from the US.
Nyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Answer:
- <u><em>D. It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Of course, ethics mandates that the target of science and <em>new technology </em>should always pursue the good for humans; nevertheless, since time immemorial man has developed technology to make war. Thus, definetely, the first statement <em>"A It always does good for human"</em> is false.
Some other negative effects of <em>new technology</em>, like cars and nuclear power, have been harmful to the environment, but you cannot tell that this has always been so. Technology has also been developed to help the environment. For instance, panels to use solar energy do not harm the environment and seek to reduce fuel burning to help the environment. Thus, option <em>B, "It always ends up doing harm to the environment"</em> is false too.
Some of the damage that new technology can produce are not predicted both because the technology is new and because it may be used with different goals to those it was developed. This explains why option <em>C, It has many bad effects</em>, is false, and option <em>D, "It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are", </em>is true.
Answer:
A farmer is the one that owns the cattle and is ready to sell it on the market demand, while the meatpacker is the one who buys the product and sells it in different parts to the end consumers.
Since they both are using the commodity market to reduce the risk, the farmer will be the one who agrees to sell the cattle in the future at a fixed rate, while the meatpacker will be the one who agrees to buy the cattle in the future at a specified price fixed by him.
Hope this helps. ThankYou.
