Answer:
Most people from Western cultures tend to avoid eye contact when conveying bad news or negative feedback.
Answer:
Nativism, assimilation, and cultural preservation are terms that help explain the relationship between mainstream society and minority groups, as well as new immigrants coming into a society.
Explanation:
The connection between nativism, assimilation, and cultural preservation are like different sides of the same coin regarding culture and society. Nativism is the idea that there is a core culture in a home country that needs to be shored up and protected vis-a-vis the arrival of outsiders or newcomers. It is the grounding of xenophobic ideas where there is a fear of outsiders and an active rejection of them on some level. Assimilation is when people who are newcomers adapt to the dominant culture and take up their values, practices and beliefs. Cultural preservation is used to protect cultural links to heritage and the past whether this be for majority populations or minorities like in the case of Native American groups and protection of their cultural heritage and lifeways vis-a-vis the mainstream.
The presidents role as the commander and chief of the military is to command the armed forces of the United States.
Tariffs have historically served a key role in the trade policy of the United States. Their purpose was to generate revenue for the federal government and to allow for import substitution industrialization (industrialization of a nation by replacing foreign imports with domestic production) by acting as a protective barrier around infant industries.[1] They also aimed to reduce the trade deficit and the pressure of foreign competition. Tariffs were one of the pillars of the American System that allowed the rapid development and industrialization of the United States. The United States pursued a protectionist policy from the beginning of the 19th century until the middle of the 20th century. Between 1861 and 1933, they had one of the highest average tariff rates on manufactured imports in the world. However American agricultural and industrial were cheaper than rival products and the tariff had an impact primarily on wool products. After 1942 the U.S. promoted worldwide free trade.
According to Dartmouth economist Douglas Irwin, tariffs have serve three primary purposes: "to raise revenue for the government, to restrict imports and protect domestic producers from foreign competition, and to reach reciprocity agreements that reduce trade barriers."[2] From 1790 to 1860, average tariffs increased from 20 percent to 60 percent before declining again to 20 percent.[2] From 1861 to 1933, which Irwin characterizes as the "restriction period", the average tariffs increased to 50 percent and remained at that level for several decades. From 1934 onwards, which Irwin characterizes as the "reciprocity period", the average tariff declined substantially until it leveled off at 5 percent.[2]
