Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The case about which the question is referring to is Griswold v. Connecticut.
The Griswold v. Connecticut was the case in which Estelle Griswold, an Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut and Dr C. Lee Buxton opened a clinic to counsel the married couples educating and counselling them about preventing contraception.
In Connecticut, the use of contraception or giving counselling about the same was a punishable offence with a fine of $50. Griswold and Buxton had challenged this law of Connecticut and were arrested with a fine. After there case being upheld in Appellate Division Court and Connecticut Supreme Court, Griswold appealed her case in the Supreme Court of the United States in 1965. In the same year, the Supreme Court gave a verdict in favour of Griswold based on the 14th Amendment of the Due Process which gives a right to privacy.
So, the answer is true.
Answer:
Unsought Good
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that prior to this the plumbers services represented an Unsought Good. This term refers to goods/services that an individual does not usually think of buying and instead is purchased out of fear of an unfortunate consequence from not making the purchase. Which would be the case in this scenario if June would have purchased the Plumbers services in fear of the pipe potentially busting. Once the pipes burst the Unsought Good became a necessity.
Answer:
Perhaps the most significant development of mathematics during the Renaissance was the invention of infinitesimal calculus by Newton and Leibniz, at the end of the 17th century. This refers to the study of change based around limits, differentials and integration.
Explanation:
