This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Write 3 sentences comparing the city and the countryside.
Example: The countryside is more beautiful than the city
Answer:
Outdoor activities are more available in the countryside than in the city.
The countryside offers a more peaceful environment than the city does.
Pollution in the city is worse than in the countryside.
Explanation:
In English, there are several ways to compare two things. The use of the comparative is the most common. When the adjective in question has two syllables and ends in any letter except "y", it is combined with "more".
However, irregular adjectives have rules of their own. In our example, "Bad" becomes "worse than".
Ok I’ll help you but with what?
The author's literary style could be described as both casual and lyrical, and has the first person narrative style.
Yann Martel's Life of Pi is about the story of a young boy's survival journey aboard a lifeboat over a period of months and confined along with a Bengal tiger. The writing the author used was considered to be both casual and lyrical which is hard to pull off together. The writing style basically means the way the author chooses to tell his story through word choice, sentence structure, and voice to fit into the purpose of the story, martel choose for going with uncomplicated and casual language to order to tell the story, and the word choice is straightforward and simple.
Secondly, he chose the omniscient narrator, in order the narrate the novel, the omniscient narrator knows and tells the inner thoughts of the story's characters, which is also called the first person narrative style which is different from second person narrator, where the narrator writes to a person or people, sometimes even to the reader.
To know more about literary style refer to the link brainly.com/question/1377623?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
Answer:
We are living in the age of digital communication. At all times we see the launch of more technological devices, with more efficient connection networks that allow us to establish communication with anyone anywhere in the world who has access to this type of technology and the best, we can do this without leaving home .
This context seems to establish a perfect reality, where communication is increasingly efficient, but it is not quite so. At least not in the opinion of Sherry Turkle, who believes that in the best place for our communication, technology is destroying it.
In his article "The Flight from Conversation," Turkle states that technology is promoting the loss of the ability to socialize and establish a face-to-face conversation, where it is difficult to hide our real feelings, or "make up" our personality. The expensive conversation the face emits a certain vulnerability that the virtual conversation does not and therefore it is preferable
Turkle uses logical resources to show that disengagement is also an important factor in this situation, because we can be close to people with our goals, but at the same time away, because we don’t need to be close to talking to them, we don’t need to answer communication between them.
Turkle uses clear and direct words, so that anyone can conclude that as technology evolves, communication becomes more artificial and rare, with no real personal connection between individuals.
