1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ugo [173]
3 years ago
12

Who did the Spanish enslave to use to take gold and silver from the mines of Mexico and Peru?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Bingel [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Asiento, the official contract for trading in slaves in the vast Spanish territories was a major engine of the Atlantic slave trade. When Spain first enslaved Native Americans on Hispaniola, and then replaced them with captive Africans, it established unfree labor as the basis for colonial mass-production.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! XDDDDDDDDDDDD

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Spanish enslaved The Asiento to take gold and silver from the mines

You might be interested in
18. What was one reason that
Marysya12 [62]

Answer:

C. African people knew agricultural

techniques that could be used in the

colonies.

Explanation:

The colonists prefer groups of individuals that already knew how to farm and manage crops instead of someone untrained and unknowledgeable.

5 0
3 years ago
What were the diplomatic meetings between Carter, Anwar el-Sadat, and Menachem Begin called?
Anastasy [175]
The diplomatic meetings between <span>Carter, Anwar el-Sadat, and Menachem was called Camp David Accord. The meetings began on 17th of September in the year 1978 and this secret meeting continued for twelve consecutive days. The meetings were held at a place called Camp David. I hope the answer helps you.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
25 POINTS PLS AWNSER ASAP!! IM TIMED! :C
lukranit [14]
They wanted strong states, weak national government, direct elections, shorter terms, and rule by the common man. Others thought the Constitution gave too much power to the central government and feared it did not protect the rights of the citizens.
5 0
3 years ago
Estelle is a very outspoken person and gives her opinion about every subject. she loves parties and crowds. she also constantly
Alla [95]
<span>according to the five-factor model of personality, estelle would score: </span><span> high on extraversion and high on neuroticism

on the five-factor model of personality, people are considered as an extrovert if they love interracting with people and became the center of attention (we can see that Estelle is outspoken and lover parties & crowds)
And people will be considered as a neurotic if they're cautious and take everything seriously (which cause Estelle to constantly worry)


</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please i need help answering these questions:
    6·1 answer
  • Lila and Sherin are sitting in their dorm room while Sherin flips through her notes. "I'm totally going to fail this math test t
    7·1 answer
  • How did ""car culture"" in the united states affect the new migration of the 1950s?
    8·1 answer
  • What technology and knowledge did the spanish need to get to tenochtitlan
    14·1 answer
  • Explain four benefits of primary production<br>​
    13·2 answers
  • What detail From the text supports the idea that Browning was a Curious child?
    15·1 answer
  • Acids taste bitter. True or False?
    9·1 answer
  • Define bioterrorism:
    14·1 answer
  • an ethical model that suggest that there is a code and wrong that everyone can see and follow is known as
    13·1 answer
  • Describe an action that Congress could take to respond to the Arizona v. United States (2012) decision if it disagreed with the
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!