Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Answer:
This is an example of Post Traumatic Growth.
Explanation:
Denise lost her home and belongings in a flood and left with her family, she then recognized that her family and others are the most important things in her life. She feels ready to start a new life.
When a person passes through a crisis or trauma, there could be two possible outcomes, either he or she goes into chronic depressions or he or she feels a positive energy to take a new start of his life. So this is the case with Denise, she feels ready to start a new life after realizing that the belongings are nothing but family and friends are everything. This is basically a positive change which may occur in a person due to a trauma or crisis he has been through. Such traumas can be considered as the life changing events in a person's life. So this is called the Post Traumatic Growth.
Answer:
The Himalayas in the west and the Gobi in the north were two important geographic barriers. They made the spread of ideas and goods between the ancient Chinese and others outside the region difficult. The early Chinese were so isolated that they came to believe that China was the world's only civilization.
Explanation:
Answer:
both cooperative learning and problem-centered instruction
Explanation:
The collaborative learning method refers to the process of learning in which the group of students involves a particular problem to solve it or to accomplish any specific task. It is believed that learning is a process involving continuous involvement and is considered a social act altogether. In the given case, Mr. WIllis has used both cooperative learning and problem-centered instruction. By separating the students and then collaborating to a conclusion, he used the method of cooperative learning. At the same time, he gave the instruction centered on the problem.
Answer:Positive correlation
Explanation:
What Is Positive Correlation?
Positive correlation refers to a relationship that exist between two variables in such that they tend to move towards the same direction, in such that one one variable increases the other also increases and also when the other variable decreases the other one also decreases.
Statistically a great positive correlation is shown by a coefficient value of +1.0, whereas when there is no correlation that is shown by 0 and perfect inverse is shown by -1.0 coefficient. The vital thing to take note of is that this doesn't mean causation , which means it doesn't mean that the other variable is the direct cause of changes in the other variable. Positive correlation just means the two variables tend to behave the same way percentage and direction wise. For example this can be seen when teh price of the product is changed like when the demand increases the price also rises.
When people increase their food intake their weight scores tend to increase and when they decrease their food intake their weight scores tend to decrease however we know there are so many things that can increase weight gain not food itself but these two tends to move towards the same direction and percentage.
