1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natulia [17]
3 years ago
12

Is the following statement a good definition? Why? An integer is divisible by 100 if and only if its last two digits are zeros.

Yes, it is. When the definition is separated into two conditional statements, both of the statements are true. No, it is not. When the definition is separated into two conditional statements, one of the statements is false. Yes, it is. When the definition is separated into two conditional statements, one of the statements is true. No, it is not. When the definition is separated into two conditional statements, both of the statements are false.
Mathematics
1 answer:
kifflom [539]3 years ago
6 0
The given statement is:
An integer is divisible by 100 if and only if its last two digits are zeros

The two conditional statements that can be made are:

1) If an integer is divisible by 100 its last two digits are zeros.

This is a true statement. If a number is divisible by 100, it means 100 must be a factor of that number. When 100 will be multiplied by the remaining factors, the number will have last two digits zeros. 

2) If the last two digits of an integer are zeros, it is divisible by 100.

This is also true. If last two digits are zeros, this means 100 is a factor of the integer. So the number will be divisible by 100.

Therefore, the two conditional statements that are formed are both true.

So, the option A is the correct answer.
Yes, it is. When the definition is separated into two conditional statements, both of the statements are true
You might be interested in
Pllzlzz answer
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

x ≈ 6

Step-by-step explanation:

The legs of an isosceles triangle are congruent , both 2x - 4 , then

x + 2x - 4 + 2x - 4 = 24 , that is

5x - 8 = 24 ( add 8 to both sides )

5x = 32 ( divide both sides by 5 )

x = 6.4 ≈ 6 ( to the nearest whole number )

8 0
2 years ago
Inverse property <br> Commutative property<br> Associative Property<br> Identity Property
defon
Communitive property
4 0
3 years ago
5y - 3z + 4y -1z - 3y; y = 3 and z = -2
Dafna11 [192]
5(3)-3(-2)
15-(-6)=
15+6=21
a negative plus a negative is a positive so its 21
4(3)-3(-2)
12-(-6)
12+6=18
21+18=39
8 0
3 years ago
4/6 + 1/12. Quick answer.
Fynjy0 [20]

nvm lol 3/4( had to redo

6 0
3 years ago
Helllp plzz pic above ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬇️⬇️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
SIZIF [17.4K]
The correct answer is d
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Solve the system of equations using the Addition method. 2a + 3b = -1 3a + 5b = -2
    6·1 answer
  • In the diagram below, \overline{XY}
    15·1 answer
  • Find the distance between the pair of parallel lines.
    8·2 answers
  • Peyton borrowed some money from her friend in order to help buy a new video game system and agreed to pay the friend back a cons
    12·1 answer
  • What is this please? i’ll give you brainliest
    7·2 answers
  • What is the domain of the inverse of y=4x-3
    6·1 answer
  • A proportional relationship between y and x. When x = 3, y=−4 .
    13·1 answer
  • Find mAC. Will give brainliest
    11·1 answer
  • Is 92% on a math exam an A+ or an A?
    6·2 answers
  • Ama bought 12 eggs at $1.10 each. If 3 of the eggs got broken and sold the remaining at $1.45 each, calculate the
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!