One basic assumption underlying research on Agenda-setting is that the media has the ability to tell us what is important.
<h3>What is Agenda-setting ?</h3>
Agenda-setting describes the "ability (of the news media) to influence the importance placed on the topics of the public agenda". The study of agenda-setting describes the way media attempts to influence viewers, and establish a hierarchy of news prevalence.
Nations judged to be endowed with more political power receive higher media exposure. The agenda-setting by media is driven by the media's bias on things such as politics, economy and culture, etc.
The evolution of agenda-setting and laissez-faire components of communication research encouraged a fast pace growth and expansion of these perspectives. Agenda-setting has phases that need to be in a specific order in order for it to succeed.
Learn more about Agenda-setting on:
brainly.com/question/23960679
#SPJ4
The theoretical approach that focuses on identifying the basic elements of mental processes is structuralism.
That statement is true
empirical data and theoretical guidelines are created after conducting through research on a certain subject and making the conclusion heavily tested by other experts on similar field. Suing such data and guidelines to analyze a certain problem would increase the chance of success in delivering appropriate solution.
Progressives believe in social justice, and this conflicts with social control because there're different social group levels, some below others in wealth etc. While it would be ideal to have a society where wealth opportunities and privileges are evenly distributed, it is almost impossible to put that into effect without making a social group angry and greatly disrupting social order. This would require drastically taking from one group to give to another, leading to chaos (People choosing not to follow laws or the government). This divides progressives who are pushing for social justice, and those who are looking to keep social control. The present day result is less social equality in order to continue to make people follow social laws and be peaceful. Creating a larger social gap.
Answer:
It is permissible, but under certain circumstances it is forbidden.
Explanation:
Think about Romeo and Juliet, their love was forbidden and that's why the went to such great lengths to keep it, but in the end, they did not get to enjoy because they died.
But for a modern day example, think about gay couples, they love each other but in some countries it is forbidden. They can't love each other with out suffering the consequences.
That only describes romantic love. Platonic love, on the other hand, is always permissible. You are always welcome to love others and show your love. For example, giving people gifts is a way to show love, and it is always permissible. There is no law against being nice.
I hope this long explanation actually helped answer your question in some way.