Answer:
Retribution
Explanation:
Retribution is the act of taking revenge. It is harming someone in pay back for something harmful that they have done. The mother of the murdered child want some form of revenge because she believes her child was killed by someone who can never have remorse for what was done to her child . She feels retribution is the best form of punishment for what wasndonr to her child.
Answer:
The correct answer is B) Goods and services are produced and distributed.
Explanation:
That is the correct answers because I went and looked that question that you had asked up on google and just typed in the answer that google had gave me in so that I could send it to you for your answer. So you are welcome. I hope that I had gave you the correct answer. Please let me know if I had gave you the incorrect answer okay?
Please give me a rating if you think I had gave you the correct answer. I will let you know how many points I am giving out to people all right?
Answer: Totalitarianism
Explanation: Totalitarianism is a form of government where the head of government maintains absolute control over the rulings, affairs and administration of all sectors of governance. Totalitarian government is characterized by complete disregard of law, absence of Democratic freedom, extensive military dominance, complete control over economic decision and resources. It is widely regarded as the most complete form of authoritarian rule. Adolf Hitler, ruler of the German Nazi is regarded as one of most notable dictator of complete totalitarian regime the world has ever seen.
Answer:
New Zealanders value a strong multicultural society, with 89% agreeing that it is a good thing for society to be made up of people from different races, religions and cultures
Answer:
there is a valid contract, but there has been no breach of that contract by the University or by Joe.
Explanation:
Joe met all the requirements the university required of course candidates that Joe would like to take. Although Joe seems to be an excellent candidate, he was not approved, while people with grades below him were proven. This sounds like an unfair case, but this was a situation where a valid contract exists, but there was no breach of that contract by the University or Joe. This is because despite Joe's selection criteria, the university stated that other criteria (chosen by the university itself) would be chosen to select candidates. Therefore it can be stated that Joe did not meet these criteria and therefore was not selected.
