The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
Japan faced a shortage of oil. The Japanese decided to attack Pearl Harbor.
Answer:
"Using unexpected force to create alarm and a sense of danger"
Explanation:
Terrorism is generally defined as "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." This shows that the first answer is the best.
Explanation:
https://youtu.be/cHyLTbaoh4Y?t=62
In August 1945, it appeared inevitable that Japanese civilians would have to suffer more death and casualties before surrender. A ground invasion would result in excessive American casualties as well. Another option was to demonstrate the power of atomic bomb to frighten the Japanese into surrendering.
