This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
Answer: Fracking
Explanation: Shale gas is extracted using the process of fracking
have both of them be right next to each other at the same time and ask them what's going on so they can't lie while being right next to each other. If they both don't fess up just make sure they're always seperated.
Answer:
Bidhya Devi Bhandari
Explanation:
The current president is Bidhya Devi Bhandari, who was first elected in October 2015. She is the first female head of state of Nepal.
Answer:
people have no objective standard by which to judge themselves.
Explanation:
Social comparison theory: In social psychology, the "social comparison theory" was proposed by Leon Festinger, and is defined as the tendency of an individual to compare himself or herself to that of another person similar to him or her produces accurate or precise appraisals of his or her beliefs and capabilities. It can often lead to weights of uniformity.
The comparison of oneself to others often results in self-motivation, positive self-image, and self-improvement.
In the question above, the statement signifies the occurrence when people have no objective standard by which to judge themselves.