Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Samurai a quiet, contemplative way to reach enlightenment in Buddhsim, as well as focus their minds.
Answer:
The correct answer would be A. -5+2=-3 -3/2=-1.5 aka: -3/2 (x, y) (1, -3/2)
b option steam ships hope it helps u
The supremacy law that establishes the federal government establishes that the state governments must be subordinate to the federal authority. In line with this law, whenever the interests of the federal government collide with those of state governments, the interest of federal government shall always supersede.
<span />
