Answer:
1- Leader of Iran before the Iranian Revolution --- Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi
2- Nationalist prime minister of Iran --- Mohammed Mossadegh
3- Leader of the Islamic Republic after the Revolution --- Ayatollah Khomeini
Explanation:
1- Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was shah of Iran from September 16, 1941 until the Islamic Revolution of February 11, 1979. He was the second and last monarch of the Pahlavi dynasty and the last Iranian shah.
2- Mohammad Mosaddeq was a democratically elected prime minister in Iran that ruled between 1951 and 1953.
On March 20, 1951, he nationalized oil. After blocking Iran and exerting other pressures, the United States and the United Kingdom financed a coup organized by the CIA and encouraged by MI6 in 1953, which overthrew Mosaddeq and established a monarchical dictatorship headed by Sha Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
3- Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini was an Iranian ayatollah, political-spiritual leader of the Islamic Revolution of 1979, which overthrew the Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlevi, and Supreme Leader of the country until his death. Western powers considered him a fanatical leader, whose political initiatives jeopardized international stability. He is considered the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Answer:
he was improsoned in 1782
Explanation:
1782 remember
The legacy of this classical culture has had<span> a significant influence on culture </span>today<span>, ... The draped clothes on </span>ancient Greek<span> statues and paintings influence fashion </span>today. ... Every four years inancient Greece, rival city-states<span> entered into a formal ... is democracy, which is itself a Greek word literally meaning "</span>people<span> power.</span>
The pros of imperialism included improvements to local transportation and the building of additional schools and hospitals, while the cons included the domination of the economy and government and oppression of local people.<span>When European powers came into a foreign country and took it over, they tended to completely dominate that country. The upside of this arrangement was that the European country brought their more advanced technology into the country. This meant that vaccines and improved hospitals came into the country, which could substantially improve the health of the population. Imperialist powers also tended to build better roads and introduce better means of transportation than the country had previously such as steamboats. The downsides of imperialism included that the mother nation often imposed heavy taxes on colonies. Colonies also rarely had any representation in the governments that imposed rule on them, even if the populations from the mother countries had democratic representation. Imperialist-controlled areas had no voice in the government and no say about the rules that governed their behavior. This meant that there were often cultural clashes over issues such as religion if the mother country had a different religion than the colony. It often took bloody uprisings for colonies to gain the ability to rule themselves.
It might be a lot but it is correct
</span><span />
Either 1st or last but I think the last
