The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
Donald trump has coronavirus and Joe Biden has the biggest mask ever and im gay
and im the cheese monster
- Currency Act
- The Stamp Act
-Townsend Acts
(In 1773 a law was passed giving the British East India Company tax-free status in the colonies).
Pure capitalism can be seen in the US. Businesses are run using capital. Those with the capital have a better edge in running the market. Capital investments, shares, labor, and industries are capital based.<span> The economy gets interconnected with capital. Thus, this makes the US a good capitalist model. However, in this design i</span><span>mprovements and profits are not equalized but heavily competed.</span>
<span>On the other hand in socialism, industries are all nationalized or operated by the government. </span><span> </span><span>The concern of this economic system is to equally divide the wealth among the people.</span><span> </span><span> </span><span>Everything is centered on the government to control.</span>
