1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anarel [89]
3 years ago
11

Mandatory sentences have become common in the criminal justice system, requiring definitive sentences to be imposed in each rele

vant case. In Maryland, for example a second-time drug distribution charge can result in a mandatory 10-year prison sentence and someone using a handgun in the commission of certain felonies face a mandatory 5-year sentence. What are the pros and cons of having such mandatory sentences? What is your view regarding the imposition of such sentences? Are they effective? Why or why not?
Law
1 answer:
Svet_ta [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Mandatory sentences have a general rule, a judge will decide the punishment once the trial is done.  This law came to stop drug crimes.  

The pros of this law are a way to stop drug distribution and prevent them from committing more drug crimes.  

But at the same time is unjust, and doesn’t allow for the judge to be flexible in the process of sentencing individuals, where in some cases they might be innocent.  

These sentencing laws are starting to fail, some lawmakers, and states begun to have other alternatives such as instead of jail, they are forced into treatment programs.  They are called drug court and they are more cost effective. And prevent once they are out of jail keep committing crimes.  

You might be interested in
Are women more ethical than men in the workplace? What are the ethics underlying your decision? Support your answer with reason.
vfiekz [6]
Abstract. Gender is one of the most frequently studied variables within the ethics literature. In prior studies that find gender differences, females consistently report more ethical responses than males. However, prior research also indicates that females are more prone to responding in a socially desirable fashion
8 0
1 year ago
The supreme court serves what important function in the us federal goverment
scoundrel [369]

Explanation:

The supreme court has its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government. the president and Congress, recognizes the limits of it's own power

7 0
3 years ago
incoterms 2020 can be used for domestic and international purchases purchases involving ocean freight only international purchas
Mumz [18]

EXW, FOB, CFR, and DDP are the Incoterms that are most frequently used in relation to marine freight. They can be separated into two groups based on advantages for both buyers and sellers.

Simply said, FOB and EXW are the most advantageous rules for a buyer. They give the option of selecting a freight forwarder, who is in charge of planning a significant portion of the shipment. In contrast, the seller selects a freight forwarding company when using CFR or DDP.

Furthermore, compared to CFR and DDP, EXW and FOB terms offer more flexibility in terms of planning, budgeting, and transportation. Who pays for costs associated with, for example, loading and unloading, customs processes, and insurance are also determined under Incoterms 2020.

FOB is without a doubt the rule that is applied the most in maritime transit. It should be noted that this choice solely and only pertains to interior and maritime transportation.

Like FOB, CIF is only used in the context of maritime and inland shipping. It is the second most popular rule in marine transportation as a result. An alternative to CIF in this situation is a CIP rule. It is not advised to transport containers using CIF.

The Incoterms 2020 FCA rule is the foundation for about 40% of contracts throughout the world. The fundamental reason for this is that it pertains to all forms of transportation, including combination transport.

Any mode of transportation is subject to Incoterms 2020 DAP. This formula can also be applied to combined transportation, which combines several modes of transportation.

To know more about customs processes click here

brainly.com/question/14654945

#SPJ4

6 0
8 months ago
PLS HURRY What countries were allied in World War I and opposed in World War II? Russia and Germany Germany and Britain France a
Dovator [93]

Answer:

The Allies of World War I or Entente Powers were a coalition of countries led by France, the United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, Japan, and the United States against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria, and their colonies during the First World War (1914–1918).

By the end of the first decade of the 20th century, the major European powers were divided between the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance. The Triple Entente was made up of France, Britain, and Russia. The Triple Alliance was originally composed of Germany, Austria–Hungary, and Italy, but Italy remained neutral in 1914. As the war progressed, each coalition added new members. Japan joined the Entente in 1914 and after proclaiming its neutrality at the beginning of the war, Italy also joined the Entente in 1915. The term "Allies" became more widely used than "Entente", although the Principal Allies of France, Britain, Russia, Italy, and Japan were sometimes known also as Quintuple Entente.[1] The colonies administered by the countries that fought for the allies were also part of the Entente Powers such as British India, French Indochina, and Japanese Korea.

The United States joined in 1917 (the same year in which Russia withdrew from the conflict) as an "associated power" rather than an official ally. Other "associated members" included Serbia, Belgium, Montenegro, Asir, Nejd and Hasa, Portugal, Romania, Hejaz, Panama, Cuba, Greece, China, Siam (now Thailand), Brazil, Armenia, Luxembourg, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Haiti, Liberia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Uruguay and Honduras.[2] The treaties signed at the Paris Peace Conference recognised Great Britain, France, Italy, Japan and the United States as 'the Principal Allied and Associated.

3 0
2 years ago
I need 5 claims against gun control laws.
djyliett [7]

Answer:

1. we already have laws

2. banning the use of guns is unconstitutional (2nd amendment)

3. it's not the gun itself but the person behind the gun

4. gun control has been proven to be unsuccessful (look at Australia's homicide rates with various weapons)

5. banning or limiting guns restricts our access to protection against other people, corrupt government, etc

Explanation:

for #3, more ppl stop school shootings, mass murders, etc. before they happen, but they never show up on the news bc it's not a good enough story. social media and even the news nowadays is super biased, never shows all of the facts, and exaggerates things, so don't believe everything you see on the internet.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • By criticizing the party that is in power, the party that is out of power serves a
    5·1 answer
  • Dainty Ltd has an average weekly payroll of $200 000. The employees are entitled to 2 weeks', non- vesting sick leave per annum.
    6·2 answers
  • This chart describes how a bill becomes a law in Arizona.
    5·1 answer
  • Biden’s White House team and Cabinet secretaries I need a very detailed paragraph about this
    10·1 answer
  • Cuales son sus diferencias de cuento leyenda y fabula​
    7·1 answer
  • How might reading about a case or hearing about it on TV influence jurors?
    6·1 answer
  • Help me answer this questions please
    11·2 answers
  • To be deductible as mortgage interest
    7·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from The Secret Garden. The native servants she had been used to in India were not in the least like this. They
    13·1 answer
  • How can people demonstrate their understanding of the responsibilities duties and obligations of citizenship
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!