Marc insisted he was going straight. After serving two years for homicide, the maximum for juveniles in Washington, D.C., the 18-year- old said he was giving up the fast life.
He was already a veteran criminal. He had received his first gun at age 13 from a neighborhood drug dealer, who had recruited him to enforce drug deals. Even before his arrest for homicide three years later, he said that he had shot at dozens of people. But now that was behind him, he proudly told Claire Johnson, then-director of the District of Columbia Criminal Justice Research Center.
So Johnson was understandably startled when the young man mentioned casually over a meal later that he had enlisted another boy to shoot someone with whom he was having an argument. For him, that was staying out of trouble, Johnson recalls incredulously. That's how he saw it. He wasn't actually [shooting people] anymore: He was paying someone else to do it. 1
Youths like Marc -- their value systems shaky at best -- make the public scared about young offenders and dubious of the nation's juvenile justice system. Rather than rehabilitating juveniles who have gone astray, the system often seems to release hardened criminals only to enable them to claim new victims.
Across the country, lawmakers are scrambling to respond to Americans who see crime as their prime worry, and juvenile punishment as too short and too soft. Topping the agenda for many state legislatures are proposals to give youths adult sentences for violent crimes, outlaw gun possession by minors and build more boot camps for young offenders. Indeed, 73 percent of the respondents to a recent USA Today/CNN/Gallup survey said juveniles who commit violent crimes should be punished the same as adults. 2
In a special session on youth crime called last September by Gov. Roy Romer, D-Colo., the Colorado General Assembly lowered from 16 to 14 the age at which juveniles charged with violent crimes are tried as adults. Public concern in the state was galvanized by a string of shootings over the spring and summer in which several children were critically injured in crossfire from gang fights. In one instance, a 10-month-old at the Denver zoo was grazed in the forehead by a bullet apparently fired two blocks away. 3
These are kids committing very adult crimes, says Colorado Republican state Rep. Jeanne Adkins. One of the first juveniles held under the new law was charged with shooting a 4-year-old boy who has been paralyzed for life. This [legislation] says there is a consequence for your actions, regardless of your age, Adkins says. 
Adkins, chair of the Colorado House Judiciary Committee, introduced a ban on juvenile gun possession after two youths, one white and one Hispanic, from a relatively upscale neighborhood in her suburban Denver district were convicted in the shooting death of a highway patrol officer. In Colorado, this is an across-the-board problem from a racial and economic standpoint, she says. We have continued to see in our 15-to-19-year-old male population an escalation from the kinds of petty offenses they were committing a decade ago to serious violent offenses that today's [outdated] children's code cannot address in any way.
It is not. A new dress is a consumer good.
Economic argument could be seen as an attempt to support the idea of promoting economic growth thorough promotion of trade. It supports that the integration makes an attempt to to achieve additional gains from the free flow of trade and investment between countries beyond those attainable under international agreements such as the WTO.
The political argument holds that with such arrangements and agreements , nations linked each other and become more dependent on each other and forming a structure where they regularly have to interact, the likelihood of violent conflict and war will decrease, and also by linking nations together, they have greater clout and are politically much stronger in dealing with other nations.
Discriminatory tariff reductions lead to trade creation and trade diversion, due to which there is a fall in regional integration.
Here are some ideas for argumental topics that allow you to collect information to support your opinion.
Moral Dilemmas
A moral dilemma forces you to think about the right thing to do in a challenging situation. Is it right to steal a loaf of bread to feed your starving family? Is it right to kill someone who is endangering your life? Can two wrongs ever make a right? A good dilemma allows for development on either side of the argument, which is why moral dilemmas are perfect argumental topics.
Political Issues
Political issues are excellent argumental topics if you need inspiration. A little research into opposing politicians' speeches can help you discover the basics of either position. Take these basics and transform the arguments into your own words for a great argumentative essay.
Human Rights Issues
Whether it's crime and punishment or interfering with another government's crime and punishment, human rights issues can make a great argumental topic. Whose needs are the most important? You must choose whether to interfere or not, and defend that choice.
Issues of Personal Interest
If you're looking for something closer to home for your argumental topic, choose an issue near and dear to your heart. Should the school cafeteria serve more pizza or more organic produce? Does every teenager need a cell phone and a car? You've argued with your parents, now turn it into an actual argumental topic and support your heartfelt point of view. As a bonus, you may be able to make real changes in your personal life to your own benefit.
The best argumental topics have two possible valid points of view and provide room for you to gather plenty of evidence in support of the side that you choose. Remember to support your own point of view and find talking points to undermine the opposition. This shows that you truly understand the argumental topic you're discussing.
Explanation:
South Africa is facing significant income and wealth inequality. The expectation was, after 1994, that something will improve. Only other thing that's different, though, is the oppressor's colour. There are almost as many powerful black people today as there are white folks. This seems to be a positive idea, on the surface of it. The truth isn't so sweet, though. The rich black community is not the impact of international prosperity, but has actually displaced thousands of potential South Africans who may have relocated to several other nations.
