Answer:
<u>Option A. The following conclusion can be drawn about the effectiveness of the First and Second Continental Congress:</u>
The success of the First and Second Continental Congress at peaceably organizing legislation against Great Britain demonstrated the effectiveness of a representative government.
Explanation:
From 1774 until 1789 The Continental Congress served as the government of the 13 American colonies and later the United States. On September 5th, 1774, representatives of 12 of the colonies met in Philadelphia in what was going to be called the First Continental Congress. The colony of Georgia did not send a representative to the meeting as it was fighting a Native American uprising and needed the British support for supplies. After a debate, the delegates issued a letter to King George III demanding to stop the Intolerable Acts and if failing to do so, the colonies would begin the boycott against England. The Second Continental Congress happened on May 10th, 1775, and this time all 13 colonies were present. These meetings were happening now during the Revolutionary War and as a consequence of it, the debates were mainly about creating an army, and beginning to draft what on July 4th, 1776 became the Declaration of Independence and later on in 1781 the Articles of the Confederation.
Both the First and the Second Continental Congress were successful in their main objective which as to open a peaceful debate between the colonies and to join forces to fight against British rule. The organization shown in both of them demonstrated the effectiveness of a representative government.
islamic empire would be the answer
B. Industrialization created new jobs in cities
Answer:
Some benefits that colonial rule brought to Southeast Asia were that initiated a modern economic system, there were roads, highways, and railroads built, and the development of an export market created a entrepreneurial class of people in rural areas. Even though most of the profits went back to the colonial mother country, some growers of rubber, palm oil, coffee, tea, and spices made profits. I think the disadvantages outweighed the advantages because they still didn't have a lot of freedom and couldn't freely trade how they wanted to.
Oil has definitely and negatively impacted the social, political, and financial factors of the Middle East.
<h3>How does oil have an effect on the economy of Middle East?</h3>
Oil has elevated the wealth of the economic system however additionally caused overseas debt. It stored Saudi Arabia out of the Arab Spring, however, has caused political corruption in a few countries.
The oil-rich monarchies have extremely wealthy, and the rate of corruption has increased in the Middle East.
therefore, the biggest challenge faced by the Middle East due to oil is Corruption.
learn more about Middle East here:
brainly.com/question/20290184
#SPJ1
