Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
The article of Confederation
Those serbs were convicted of War crimes because they approve the policy of ethnic cleansing in the war.
Ethnic cleansing refer to the policy in which they massacre a specific ethnic groups in their society. This practice deemed as really inhumane so they had to be convicted because of that
The federalists wanted a constitution that would be able to defend citizens from abuses of power. But they saw no incompatibility between individual rights and the formation of a minimally structured central power to confront the complex problems. In opposition were the anti-federalists
, they insisted that states should be free and independent and saw the creation of the United States as a new form of tyranny.
This is important to show how the US can be free and democratic about the opinions.
Answer:
King John
Explanation:
Following a revolt by the English nobility against his rule, King John puts his royal seal on Magna Carta, or “the Great Charter.” The document, essentially a peace treaty between John and his barons, guaranteed that the king would respect feudal rights and privileges, uphold the freedom of the church.
