Answer:
$41.66
Explanation:
Let us assume the dividend in year n be denoted by Dn and the Stock price by Pn
Given that,
D0 = $1.50
Now
Growth rate for next 3 years
g1 = 15%
D1 = D0 × (1 + g1)
= 1.50 × (1 + 0.15)
= 1.725
D2 = D1 × (1 + g1)
= 1.725 × (1 + 0.15)
= 1.984
D3 = D2 × (1 + g1)
= 1.984 × (1 + 0.15)
= 2.282
Subsequent Growth rate = g2 = 4%
Now
D4 = D3 × (1 + g2)
= 2.282 × (1 + 0.04)
= 2.373
So, According to Gordon's Growth Rate,
P3 = D4 ÷(r - g2)
P3 = 2.373 ÷ (0.09 - 0.04)
= $47.46
Now
Value of Stock now is
= P0
= D1 ÷ (1 + r) + D2 ÷ (1 + r)^2 + D3 ÷ (1 + r)^3 + P3 ÷ (1 + r )^3
= 1.725 ÷ (1 + 0.09) + 1.984 ÷ (1 + 0.09)^2 + 2.282 ÷ (1 + 0.09)^3 + 47.46 ÷ (1 + 0.09)^3
= $41.66
<span>Include generalized statements the say, in effect, "take my word for it, I have what you are seeking."
People generally respond to advertisement that specifically address their personal needs/issue. Those type of sentences which ask others to trust you without solid reason will only make you seem too untrustworthy to be approached.
</span>
Question Completion:
ANSWER CHOICES
A. operating with decreasing returns to scale
B. a natural monopoly
C. a legal monopoly
D. monopolistically competitive
E. productively efficient
Answer:
Based on this data, the market for product Z is:
A. operating with decreasing returns to scale.
Explanation:
For the Average Revenue (Price) to equal the Average Total Cost (ATC) and enable the firms operating in the market to break-even, the firms must increase their production units from 2 million to 3.5 million units. The conclusion that the market for product Z is operating with decreasing returns to scale for a single supplier is because it will take a 75% increase in production for the average total cost to fall from $7 to $5 for the single producer. In other words, the percentage increase in production does not result in a proportionate decrease in average total cost.
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
can i get brainliest? plzzzz
Explanation:
a. Ralph is in charge of the land, with an implicit right to payment in compliance with right doctrine (North American Oil Consol. v. Burnet (1932, S.Ct.) 286 US 414). This year, however, gross sales are made, although they may be reimbursed later.
b. Unless he returns money to Acme this year, Ralph will be able to claim a deduction of $5,000. Although Ralph originally paid the $1,750 tax on invoice and only saved $1,400 on the reduction of the refund and because the repayment timing resulted in an additional $350 tax. As the amount refunded to Ralph is more than $3,000 according to IRC§ 1341a. This is possible for Ralph to use the taxes accrued in the next year from the same refund to cover taxes. So Ralph will say a tax offset of $1,750 instead of a deduction of $5,000.
c.The sum of the deduction must be more than $3,000, according to IRC § 1341(a). Because Ralph spent just $2,500, he is not liable for tax reduction deductions, but can only claim a refund deduction.