Answer:
a. Quality Software - Prescriptive Analytics
b. ABC Supermarket - Descriptive Analytics
c. Global Hospitality - Diagnostic Analytics
d. XYZ - Predictive Analytics
e. Manufacturing - Descriptive Analytics
Explanation:
Descriptive analytics is the strategy which uses the past data and creates a summary for historical data to create future analysis.
Predictive Analytics is the strategy which uses statistical calculations and models to predict the future.
Diagnostic Analytics is the strategy which the analyst observes the past event and then examines why certain situation happened. This is used by analysts to make sure that historic mistakes are not repeated.
Prescriptive Analytics is the strategy in which strategic planning is made after the operational activities are analyzed and then strategies are formed in order to plan future performance.
Answer:
B. International trade enables specialization, which brings increased efficiency and greater competition.
Explanation:
The closest to the minimum number of consumers needed to obtain the estimate with the desired precision is (b) 271
Explanation:
When the prior estimate of population proportion is not given , then the formula to find the sample size is given by :-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ed57/4ed575a33bf2aef3fa57be600048c10f726ec416" alt="n=0.25(\frac{z^{*} }{E} )^{2}"
where E = Margin of error.
z* = Critical z-value.
As per given , we have
E = 5%=0.05
Confidence level = 90%
The critical value of z at 90% is 1.645 (By z-table)
Put all values in the formula , we get
n=0.25(1.645/0.05)²
n=0.25(32.9)²
n=270.6025≈271
Thus, the minimum sample size needed = 271
Hence , the correct answer is 271 .
Answer:
$3,208
Explanation:
The computation of the future value is shown below;
As we know that
Future valie = Present value × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
where
Present value is $2,500
Rate of interest = 2.5% ÷ 4 = 0.625%
And, the time period is = 10 × 4 = 40
So, the future value is
= $2,500 × (1 + 0.625%)^40
= $3,208
Based on the statement above, the courts will determine the
agreement to be likely as unenforceable and it is likely to be not voided. The agreement
is likely to be impossible to be enforced by the higher authorities thought it
is not voided or considered to be valid.