Question

Easy question. Will give brainliest

Answer 1

Answer:

The commensal relationship between the sharks and remoras can be described as although remoras consume parasites, sharks with remoras show no better health or growth than sharks without remoras.

Explanation:

A commensal relationship refers to a relationship where two or more organisms in a habitat neither benefit or harm each other.

• The second option infers that the remoras harm the sharks. This is a parasitic relationship.
• The third option infers that the sharks are harmed by the remoras because the sharks depend on something that the remoras are limiting. This is also a parasitic relationship.
• The fourth option infers a commensal relationship, but falsely describes it. The relationship described by this option is a parasitic relationship (one benefits, the other does not).

Therefore, the answer is the first option: Although remoras consume parasites, sharks with remoras show no better health or growth than sharks without remoras.

Answer 2

Answer:

The commensal relationship between the sharks and remoras can be described as although remoras consume parasites, sharks with remoras show no better health or growth than sharks without remoras.

Explanation:

A commensal relationship refers to a relationship where two or more organisms in a habitat neither benefit or harm each other.

The second option infers that the remoras harm the sharks. This is a parasitic relationship.

The third option infers that the sharks are harmed by the remoras because the sharks depend on something that the remoras are limiting. This is also a parasitic relationship.

The fourth option infers a commensal relationship, but falsely describes it. The relationship described by this option is a parasitic relationship (one benefits, the other does not).

Therefore, the answer is the first option: Although remoras consume parasites, sharks with remoras show no better health or growth than sharks without remoras.