Based on this excerpt, there are several different arguments to be made against mandatory minimum sentencing laws. These include:
1) Limits the judges ability to take into account unique circumstances- As it discusses in the excerpt, mandatory minimums leave the judges powerless in the sense that they cannot give a shorter sentence than the federally prescribed amount of years. Even if a judge wants to have a shorter sentence for a first time or second time offender of a non violent crime, he/she does not have the legal ability to do so.
2) Money- Mandatory minimums ensure that individuals are kept in the prison system for a significant amount of time. Considering that prisons are funded by tax payer money, this shows that this type of mandatory minimum policy we have right now will result in a lot of taxpayer money going towards jails rather than other areas of society.
I believe since Reno, NV 7.53 is in a dessert it would most likely be your answer that you're looking for.
<span />
c. i think. Rabbi's are the leaders of jewish worship so that's what i'm guessing.
1.) Junk food is cheaper than healthier food so for someone living in poverty they most likely buying food that is cheaper. causing their health to decline because there consuming food with higher artificial fats and less nutrients
2.) many family's who live in poverty are under a lot of stress because of their current state, when your stress levels are to high it takes a toll on your health.
3.) living in poverty can also cause issues with depression which is bad for your mental help
