Answer:C) noncompensatory decision
Explanation:
Peter's decisions is fixed and made up no matter what comparisons are made of other universities but he has made up a firm decision that he can not compromise no matter how tempting the fact still remains that his girlfriend will not be close to those universities which are further away from his home town.
He had already calculated the cost of his decision and made conclusion that this is the best decision for him .
Answer:
Sugauli treaty was a treaty that defined the borders of Nepal after its expansion to other territories and conflicts with other countries aroused. It was established on the 2nd of December 1815.
Explanation:
The Sugauli treaty established the borders of Nepal after conflicts with the East India Company took place. Nepal and the East India Company signed a treaty that defined the limits of Nepal. As a consequence, Nepal lost some of its territories. The Sugauly treaty was signed on December 2, 1815, and ratified on March 4, 1816.
Answer:
I think they are all what the class mission statement would reflect, so I guess it depends on what your mission statement is it and what the class is, so like if it was "work hard play harder" you would think oh that class get benefits for working hard yk Im sorry I really hope that helps if you give me a little more information like what class it is or what the mission statement is I could help a little more :)
Answer:
It eliminates the abnormal heart rate.
Explanation:
The Chain of Survival should be applied when a patient is under cardiac arrest.
Cardiac arrest is mostly caused due to abnormal electrical activity in the victim's heart. This can result in ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia which, if not treated, could cause death.
An automated external defibrillator (AED) is designed to restore the heart's regular activity, by providing a heavy electric shock to the patient's chest. This a vital step in the chain of survival as it greatly increases the chances of survival.
Answer:
The U.S. government made reservations the centerpiece of Indian policy around 1850, and thereafter reserves became a major bone of contention between natives and non-natives in the Pacific Northwest. However, they did not define the lives of all Indians. Many natives lived off of reservations, for example. One estimate for 1900 is that more than half of all Puget Sound Indians lived away from reservations. Many of these natives were part of families that included non-Indians and children of mixed parentage, and most worked as laborers in the non-Indian economy. They were joined by Indians who migrated seasonally away from reservations, and also from as far away as British Columbia. As Alexandra Harmon's article "Lines in Sand" makes clear, the boundaries between "Indian" and "non-Indian," and between different native groups, were fluid and difficult to fix. Reservations could not bound all Northwest Indians any more than others kinds of borders and lines could.
