El trabajo de un médico se llevará a cabo en un hospital o consultorio médico
Answer:
b. cannot test his theory because his observations violate the ceteris paribus assumption
Explanation:
As per the law of supply, when price of an input rises, quantity supplied of a good falls, keeping other factors affecting supply as constant (ceteris paribus).
Leather and Shoes are complimentary goods in the sense that leather serves as an input for the product i.e shoes. So if the price of leather rises, production of shoes would fall, keeping other factors constant.
When the price of an input rises, the quantity supplied falls, keeping other factors affecting supply as constant.
In the given case, the price of inputs has increased and yet the production of shoes has increased owing to an advancement in the technology. Technology is a different determinant of quantity supplied and considered as an other factor affecting supply.
The suggestion is that poor countries reduce barriers to products relating to agriculture and <u>textile </u>products.
<h3>Why the suggestion?</h3>
- It is thought that poorer nations produce certain type of products and these should be traded freely in developed countries.
- It is hoped that this would allow poorer nations to become richer.
Some of those products include agricultural and textile products, both of which require little processing from raw materials which are abundant in poorer nations.
Find out more on agriculture in poorer nations at brainly.com/question/25077523.
Ok so one of the biggest advantages would be a lower price but not only that if it is a newer car you wont have to pay the newer car fees you basically avoid them.<span />
<span>Let the number of calories from lunch be called L. As such, breakfast is then L + 128, and dinner is 2L - 400. We can then sum the three meals and equate it to the total caloric intake, the known value of 1932.
So:
1932 = L + L + 128 + 2L - 400 = 4L - 272.
Lunch = 551
Breakfast = 551 + 128 = 679
Dinner = 2*551 - 400 = 702</span>
