What is an example of a flame

The Cutting Department of Sheridan Company has the following production and cost data for July.

alina1380 [7]

Answer:

1. Materials Conversion Costs

Total equivalent units of production 17,200 15,800

2. Cost per Equivalent Unit $ 4.05 $ 2.6

Explanation:

Cutting Department

Weighted-Average Method

1. Equivalent Units

Particulars Units % of Completion Equivalent Units

Materials Conversion Materials Conversion

Transferred Out 13,700 100 100 13,700 13,700

Ending Inventory 3500 100 60 3500 2100

Total Equivalent Units 17,200 15,800

The Ending Inventory units are 3500 which are not yet complete.

Materials Conversion Costs

Total equivalent units of production 17,200 15,800

2. Cost Per Equivalent Units

Materials Conversion

Cost Added 69,660 18,480 + 22,600

Total Costs 69,660 41,080

Equivalent Units 17,200 15,800

Cost per Equivalent Unit 69,660 / 17,200 41,080/ 15,800

$ 4.05 $ 2.6

Cost of Ending Work In Process $ 19635

Materials = 3500 * $ 4.05= $ 14175

Conversion = 2100 * $ 2.6= $ 5460

We multiply the equivalent number of units with the cost per unit to find the cost.

Cost Of Units Transferred Out = $ 91,105

Materials = 13,700 * $ 4.05= $ 55,485

Conversion = 13,700 * $ 2.6 = $ 35620

B. A Cost Reconciliation Report

Materials Conversion

Ending WIP $ 14175 $ 5460

Transferred Out $ 55,485 $ 35620

Total $ 69660 41080

These calculated costs reconcile with the costs given in the above data.

Materials Conversion

Cost Added 69,660 18,480 + 22,600

Total Costs 69,660 41,080

These costs reconcile with the given costs.

5 0

3 years ago

A financial analyst is in the process of reviewing four investments projects for one of his clients. The net present cash values

inysia [295]

Answer:

Consider the following calculation

Explanation:

All projects having positive NPVs, thus all projects are feasible.

(All figures are in $' million)

Funds required to invest in all projects are

First year = 6 + 2 + 4 + 10 = 22 & available fund for first year is only 20.

Second year = 8 + 4 + 8 + 6 = 36 & available fund for second year is only 13.

In these type of situations we use Profitability Index to decide which projects are selected and which are to be skipped.

Profitablilty index = PV of cash inflow/ PV of cash outflows

But in this such information is not given to calculate Profitability index, thus we are calculating here NPV per One $ of investment.

thus NPV per One $ of investment = NPV of project / Investment in Project

Note: We are taking here value of investment in project for both two year with out taking effect of time value of money as no discount rate is provided in the question.

CHECK THE EXCEL ATTACHED

Total fund available with investor = 20+13 = 33

Total fund required for Project 4 & Project 1= 16 + 14 =30

thus he can invest in only project 4 & Project 1, for investing in next profitable project i.e. project 2 he requires $6 million but he has only $3 million in his hands.

Thus the optimal solution for the client is to invest in Project 4 & Project 1.

Thus Funds available in first year = 20, Investment in First year = 10+6 = 16, Funds remains in hand =4

Funds available in second year = 4+ 13= 17, Investment in second year =6+8= 14, funds remains in hand = 3

NPV from total investment = 80 + 50 = 130

Download xlsx

5 0

3 years ago

Andrew and Brianna are married and live in Texas, a community-property state. For their birthdays this year Andrew gave cash gif

Vika [28.1K]

Answer: $2,600

Explanation:

Because Andrew is married, the gift tax on him is split in half between him and his wife. This means that to each of his daughters, the gift tax will be on:

= 20,900 / 2

= $10,450

This amount is less than the gift exclusion limit of $15,000 so Andrew will not be charged taxes on the gifts to his daughters.

On the gift to Brianna's niece, Andrew's gift tax will be based on:

= 35,200 / 2

= $17,600

This is above the gift exclusion limit of $15,000 by:

= 17,600 - 15,000

= $2,600

The above would therefore be Andrew's taxable gift amount.

5 0

3 years ago

The total cost (in dollars) of manufacturing x auto body frames is C(x)=60,000+400x. (A) Find the average cost per unit if 20

Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

a) Average price per unit = 700

b) average marginal cost = -1.5 dollars/frame

c) For 201 frames are produced = $698.5

Explanation:

Given Data:

C(x) = 60000 + 400x

a) Average cost for 200 units:

Total Cost of 200 units will be:

C(200) = 60000 + 400(200)

C(200) = 140,000

Total Cost of 200 units = 140,000

Average price per unit = Total Cost / number of units

Average price per unit = 140,000/200

Average price per unit = 700

b) Marginal Average Cost:

We know that marginal cost = $C^{'}$ (x)

And the average marginal cost = $\frac{d}{dx}$ $\frac{C(x)}{x}$

So,

= the derivative of ( $\frac{60,000 + 400(x)}{x}$ )

= the derivative of ( $\frac{(60,000)}{x} + 400$ )

= $\frac{-60,000}{x^{2} }$ + 0

So,

average marginal cost = $\frac{-60,000}{x^{2} }$

at x = 200 units

average marginal cost = $\frac{-60,000}{200^{2} }$

average marginal cost = -1.5 dollars/frame

c) Average cost per frame if 201 frames are produced:

We already seen in the part b that, the average marginal cost is decreasing by 1.5 dollars /frame. So,

if 201 frames are produced the instead of 200 then the difference is of 1 frame and we discussed that average marginal cost of 1 frame is decreasing at 1.5 dollars per frame.

So,

As we know the average cost from part a = 700 dollars.

Therefore, for 201 item = 700 dollars -1.5 dollars

For 201 frames are produced = $698.5

5 0

3 years ago

Which type of graphic organizer would best organize your notes on how to start a small business?

Dimas [21]

My best guess is a timeline!

4 0

3 years ago