I’m sorry but without the text I can’t answer the question I don’t know what info is there so I can’t answer without a risk
"It would be devastating to get a clot in the brachiocephalic artery!"
The cable act of 1992 gave the right to fair and effective cable. It also protected cable operators from going out of business.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Cable Act of 1992 gave buyers the option to reasonable and powerful cable. It additionally mirrored the administration's craving to shield link administrators from pushing communicate organizes out of the business and it shielded general society from foul substance.
Thus this act is clearly a fairness doctrine because it acted as fair for both the consumers also by giving them effective cable and operators of the cable also from going out of the business and giving them employment.
No because there was no list and it is not a run off sentence