How did the constitution solve the congress from having limited powers such as taxtation

1 answer:

4 0

The Constitution powers are expressly ennumerated, but the "necessary and proper cause" gives elasticity to the Constitution. This view was particularlty defended by Alexander Hamilton. The explanation is that the government has implied rights to use means adequate to its object, but that it is impossible to define all possible means that can be used by it.

You might be interested in

What event three weeks after the March on Washington showed Americans that change was needed

marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

The bombing of an African American Baptist church in Birmingham, Alabama, on September 15th, 1963, by the Klu Klux Klan.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What was true of the government under the Roman Empire?

Mazyrski [523]

Answer: The government was ruled by one leader.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Understanding the Case

S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0

3 years ago

Can someone answer all of the following questions please!! Will mark branliest

Marrrta [24]

Ok, so I researched and these are the answers

European countries involved: Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, Great Britain, France, and the USA

Asian people involved: Japan, French Indochina(Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos.), Dutch East Indies( Indonesia), Portuguese Timor( Timor-Leste), Spanish East Indies( Philippines), British Burma( Myanmar), Borneo( Brunei, Two states of Singapore that are called Sabah and Sarawak, and the Malaysian federal territory of Labuan. ), and Malaya( Malay island, and Singapore)

Ways they resisted: Asian people were being poor because of the colonization. European powers took the economy in their hands. The people were furious. They protested, or attacked the military.

Outcomes: The European countries gave the countries to their people, and thus giving independence. They left it because, they can't handle the protests, Guerilla attacks, Skirmishes etc. Because of that, their economy started falling down too.

Hope this helps, and I'm sorry for the delay( My internet is not in good condition)

7 0

3 years ago

How did the Japanese economy recover so quickly after World War II?

kykrilka [37]

Answer: B)

The Economic and Educational reforms passed by the government.

Explanation:

After World War Two, the Japanese economy was devastated. But the swift recovery of Japan was a miracle. By 1971, it became the most developed country in East Asia. In the initial phase, it focused on rebuilding the Cotton, Steel and Coal industries. During 1954-1972 it's economy received the most significant growth. In this Japanese education system played an important role as it provided the skilled and disciplined workforce. The Ministry of International Trade and Industry played the most vital role in the development as it helped the government and private sectors to improve productivity.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers