Answer:
One drawback of pure competition is that sellers don't have the opportunity to earn more than their competitors unlike in monopolies, the sellers can set their own prices.
Explanation:
Pure competition is a type of situation where sellers offer the same products of the same prices. This is also called<em> "atomistic market."</em> So you can imagine that the different companies have almost the same sale. An example of an item under pure competition is "corn." Vendors (people) usually sell them at the same price and quality. If differences do exist,<em> they're totally irrelevan</em>t.
Answer:
The answer is "Greek"
Explanation:
Social contract theory, almost as old as philosophy itself, is the view that people's good or potentially political commitments are needy upon an agreement or arrangement among them to shape the general public in which they live. Socrates use something very like an Social contract theory to disclose to Crito why he should stay in jail and acknowledge capital punishment. Nonetheless, Social contract theory is properly connected with current good and political hypothesis and is given its first full work and guard by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the most popular defenders of this gigantically persuasive hypothesis, which has been one of the most predominant speculations inside good and political hypothesis since the commencement of the cutting edge West. In the 20th century, good and political hypothesis recaptured philosophical force because of John Rawls' Kantian rendition of implicit understanding hypothesis, and was trailed by new examinations of the subject by David Gauthier and others.
All the more as of late, thinkers from alternate points of view have offered new reactions of implicit understanding hypothesis. Specifically, women's activists and race-cognizant thinkers have contended that Social contract theory is in any event an inadequate image of our good and political lives, and may truth be told disguise a portion of the manners by which the agreement is itself parasitical upon the oppression of classes of people.
Answer:
poems, podcasts, articles, and more, writers measure the human effects of war. As they present the realities of life for soldiers returning home, the poets here refrain from depicting popular images of veterans. Still, there are familiar places: the veterans’ hospitals visited by Ben Belitt, Elizabeth Bishop, Etheridge Knight, and W.D. Snodgrass; the minds struggling with post-traumatic stress in Stephen Vincent Benét’s and Bruce Weigl’s poems. Other poets salute particular soldiers, from those who went AWOL (Marvin Bell) to Congressional Medal of Honor winners (Michael S. Harper). Poet-veterans Karl Shapiro, Randall Jarrell, and Siegfried Sassoon reflect on service (“I did as these have done, but did not die”) and everyday life (“Bank-holidays, and picture shows, and spats”). Sophie Jewett pauses to question “the fickle flag of truce.” Sabrina Orah Mark’s soldier fable is as funny as it is heartbreaking—reminding us, as we remember our nation’s veterans, that the questions we ask of war yield no simple answers.
Explanation:
copy and paste it
