In the late nineteenth century, the most powerful European nations harboured a compulsive desire for conquest, domination and exploitation in the African continent, in pursuit of empire during ‘The Scramble for Africa’. Their struggle to get ‘a place in the sun’ involved the proliferation of conflicting European claims to African territory during the New Imperialism period, and was fuelled by a range of factors which varied with both the imperialist nation and the African colony. Among the primary factors for European imperialism in Africa were the grand economic prospects of opportunities for profitable investment, brilliant opportunities for trade with favourable market dynamics for the Metro pole and sources of cheap labour for industrial development. Raw materials were also readily in Africa in abundance. European Imperialism in Africa was also driven by rivalry among the superpowers. Conquest in the African continent also promised to confer prestige on the Imperialist nation, therefore European Imperialism promised to satisfy prevailing nationalist, liberal and jingoistic sentiments and interests of the period. Hence, it often emerged as a political priority, as it could diminish domestic discontent.
Answer:
The civilization of ancient Egypt was indebted to the Nile River and its dependable seasonal flooding. Their farming practices allowed them to grow staple food crops, especially grains such as wheat and barley, and industrial crops, such as flax and papyrus. ... They excelled in horticulture
Explanation:
pls i need brainlist
Um I think they didn’t have kids so this is true
Answer: B
Explanation:
in the definition of the rule of law it states something similar to this also uhhh i got it right on the test
Answer:
The answer is - Inferences
Explanation:
The options are:
A. contaminated observations.
B. inferences.
C. distorted behaviors.
D. illusory correlations.
The answer is B- inferences
Inference can be defined as a logical conclusion which is gotten on the basis of evidence and logical reasoning and through the use of knowledge and information.
In the scenario here, it is reasonable to infer that the SUV hit the smaller car due to the evidence that the smaller car is damaged while the SUV which is bigger only has a headlight broken.
