I will try my best to answer this next time
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
Answer:Montesquieu argued that the best way to secure liberty and prevent a government from becoming corrupted was to divide the powers of government among different actors who would check each other. ... Madison masterfully protected the separation of powers by establishing a thorough system of checks and balances as well
Explanation:
Answer:
Farming business in Texas that were once commercial became subsistence farms in order to compete and gain profits. I believe this is correct
Explanation:
This ship is called The Mayflower.
There were three masts, and a spritsail in the bow area. There were also three primary levels, consisting of the main deck, the gun deck, and the cargo hold.
I hope this helped and good luck!
