The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer:
I believe it is to avoid military conflict, and still getting North Korea to change their Nuclear Weapon Policies and to stop North Korea from all spending on their military.
Explanation:
North Korea seemed to spend a lot of what they have on the Military. Foreigners to North Korea, that were for the most part, part of NATO wanted to help that happen without getting into some sort of nuclear conflict. They also wanted to change nuclear weapon policies, as the START treaty was in place between the US and Russia during Obama's first term of presidency I believe, and at the time leader, and current leader, Vladimir Putin has grown to like. So they wanted to talk to North Korea about it too.
Answer:
Qualitative
Explanation:
According to my research on different research approaches, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this type of data gathering can be referred to as a qualitative approach to describing behavior. Qualitative refers to the process of focusing more on quality as opposed to focusing more on the quantity.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Child labor was big back in the 1890s. Children were deprived of their childhood. Instead of playing and having fun they were put to work. Instead of school they had to provide for their family. Ages 10 and up started to work. Most work places like coal mines were very harmful to the kids. Just from breathing the pollution in to cutting them self on work equipment it was a very dangerous place. In 1938 child labor was officially discontinued.
It is passed down through family
