Answer:
I personally believe that lab experiments are useful and an effective way to test and gather data. Even though they can often lack ecological validity and mundane realism they can easily be replicated and results can be retested, helping to prove/disprove data, ultimately leading to the creation of practical applications.
- That psychologist can make statements about cause and effect because they involve the deliberate manipulation of one variable while trying to keep the other variables constant, unlike non-experimental methods.
- Lab experiments can also be replicated due to the standardised procedures and measures, ultimately making it easier to check the reliability of the research/results and prove/disprove results if the research is conducted by another researcher.
It is accepted to be fact by those who accept it to be fact, until further experimentation or research can prove otherwise
photosynthesis as a whole takes place in the organelle called chloroplast but light reaction takes place in the chloroplast stroma
Having one theory is setting a limit on your potential and the potential of the overall theory and subject you are working on. Having multiple theories gives you a broader idea and perspective of what is going on, and even though one may slightly contradict the other, it is okay because that is what theories are for.
To the point, scientists usually have more than one theory so that they can gain a broader perspective on the matter and maybe even increase the chance of being correct on the matter.
Hope this was helpful.
Cheers,
