1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yanka [14]
3 years ago
15

Selective herbicides are only able to kill specific types of plants and often leave some weeds in the field to continue to grow.

Why would a farmer choose to use a selective herbicide?
Biology
2 answers:
Norma-Jean [14]3 years ago
8 0
Because they dont want to kill the grass or the plants that they want. but only to kill the plants its meant for 
Solnce55 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer & Explanation:

Suppose you are working as a farmer, and you want to grow corn - it's the only crop you want to grow. Of course, you'd have to make sure there isn't anything else staying with that corn, right? But why? There are many reasons as to why a farmer would choose to use a selective herbicide. One is that it reduces competition. Plant species living in the same area and using the same resources are going to compete for those resources; hence, no matter how much water you give to your corn, if there's something else using it, then your preferred crops aren't going to get enough of it. This may also determine the quality of your corn, and the amount of yield it provides. Sometimes, you might also want to get rid of annoying plants that get into your way of harvest as well. Killing a certain plant species also ensures that you have enough space for your preferred crop, as well as guaranteeing that unwanted plants won't disperse their seeds around the area and take up more space in the future.

You might be interested in
Stromatolites are rocky structures that generally form in shallow waters from the binding of sediment by microbial biofilms. Str
hjlf

<u>Answer:</u>

Approximately, the oldest stromatolites are 3.6 billion years old on earth.

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • Stromatolites is not only oldest earths fossil but conspiracy in that they are singular visual portal in deep time on earth.
  • It is defined as laminated accumulation structure that is they stick up above sea floor .
  • Stromatolite buildings includes oldest fossils which are 3.5 billions old when the earth were too unfriendly to support life.
  • The study of  fossil age, evolutionary, method of formation are known as paleontology.
  • These specimens are considered as old fossils which are around 3.4 to 4.1 billions years old.
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following dating techniques provide scientists with strong evidence that helps determine the age of a fossil
galben [10]
Without the choices, my best guess is absolute dating
6 0
4 years ago
If you had a large puddle in your backyard after a hard rain and it was gone the next day. (it disappears over night) which of t
Georgia [21]
Well it could've been all of these but if there was only one answer  I would chose number 3 :) sorry im so late:( but if there are 2 answers try 3 and 4:)
7 0
3 years ago
Pls help(Miss around l will report, if the answer is right then l will gave him brainliested!)
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

Let's say that a child has a mom with brown eyes and dad with blue eyes. Since brown eyes are dominant, the mom can have either one brown (B) and one blue (b) version of an eye color gene or she can have two browns. As geneticists like to say, she can be either Bb or BB.

To make things easier, we will say that she is BB (both genes are the brown version). Since the dad has blue eyes, he has two copies of the recessive blue version. He is bb.

Each parent will pass one copy of their eye color gene to their child. In this case, the mom will always pass B and the dad will always pass b. This means all of their kids will be Bb and have brown eyes. Each child will show the mom's dominant trait.

Now if we flip things around where the father has two brown versions (BB) and the mom has two blue ones (bb), the child will still end up Bb and having brown eyes. It doesn't matter if B came from mom or dad. It only mattered that the child got a B.

I don't want you to think that if one parent shows the dominant trait, all their children will too. They may not. Let me give another eye color example to show you what I mean.

Imagine a mom with one version of the brown and one version of the blue eye color gene. She is Bb and has brown eyes. Dad is bb and has blue eyes.

These are the same eye colors that the parents had in the first example. But the result could turn out very differently.

The kids each have a 50% chance of having mom's brown eyes and a 50% chance of having dad's blue eyes. (This is because mom has a 50% chance of passing her B and a 50% chance of passing her b.) So in this case, the kids can end up with mom's dominant trait or dad's recessive one. Which one is a simple matter of chance.*

And if we take a Bb dad (brown eyes) and a bb mother (blue eyes), there is still a 50% chance for the child to have blue eyes. Again it didn't matter which parent gave which gene version. What was important is that these two gene versions were involved.

This is true for many, many traits besides eye color. But not all of them. Sometimes it matters whether your mom or dad has a dominant trait.

Blame (or Thank) Mom Through our discussion so far, you may have picked up on the fact that we have two copies of our genes - one from mom and one from dad. But this isn't true for every gene.

Explanation:

Except for a few special cases (see below), it doesn't really matter which parent gave you which gene. If a gene version is dominant, it will dominate whether it came from mom or dad.

So your chances of getting a dominant trait don't depend on which parent it came from. If mom gives you the dominant brown eye version of an eye color gene, odds are you'll end up with brown eyes. Same thing if dad passes the same gene. In neither case would you have higher odds for getting brown eyes.

Now that isn't to say that if mom has brown eyes then all her kids will too. They could end up with the other parent's recessive blue or green eyes. Or an eye color that neither parent has!

This is how brown-eyed parents end up with a blue-eyed child. Or how two parents who don't have red hair have a redheaded baby.

As you can see, genetics is a complicated business. But one thing we do know...no one is more likely to favor one parent over the other. Which traits you get depend on the combination of genes you get from both parents.

What I'll do for the rest of the answer is explain a bit about how genes work. Then I'll focus on some situations where the parents do matter. As you'll see, this is usually when a trait is on the X chromosome.

6 0
3 years ago
Based on there feeding nature living organisms are classified in to three namely ?​
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

you mean based on their habitats? it's animals kingdom and planet kingdom..

your questions is not accurate

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Among a particular population of 100 plants, red flowers are dominant and yellow flowers are recessive. F is the dominant allele
    10·1 answer
  • 8. What is nuclear fusion and how does our universe use it?
    15·2 answers
  • Which planet is most likely to have acid rain?
    11·1 answer
  • As a cell grows, it does what ?
    7·1 answer
  • White-headed woodpeckers are adapted to have strong beaks that can break into tree trunks to find bugs and can also open pine co
    12·2 answers
  • How do passive transport and active transport differ? Is osmosis an example of passive transport or active transport? Why?
    5·2 answers
  • I’ll mark as BRANLIEST!!
    5·1 answer
  • What is the "body" of a plant called?
    14·2 answers
  • Explique le phénomène d'effet de serre​
    15·1 answer
  • the ability of an organ to adjust to changes in either its internal or external environments is called
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!