1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nostrana [21]
3 years ago
5

According to your instructor, the philosophical doctrine that argues: (1) Biology is "something more" than chemistry or physics

because it introduces the element of "life" into the analysis; (2) Psychology is "something more" than biology because it introduces the element of "mind" into the analysis; and (3) Sociology is "something more" than psychology because it introduces the element of "social structure" into the analysis, is known as ________.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Karolina [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The answer to the question: According to your instructor, the philosophical doctrine that argues....., is known as:___, would be: Emergence.

Explanation:

Emergence is a common belief among different fields of study and knowledge and it is defined as the appearance of qualities, or characteristics in an observed entity that emerge from it when all the parts of the entity work together as a whole and allow this hidden, but part of the quality of the entity to emerge. In other words, emergence occurs when characteristics unknown to an entity emerge from the unity of the entity and not from its individualized parts. For example, in the case of this instructor, he says that biology is "more than" chemistry because it introduces the element of "life", and therefore biology is not simply chemistry, is more than that, because when its elements are taken together, biology offers more than simple chemistry. And he says the same for psychology and sociology. He build this up, furthermore, to show that each field of study mentioned afterwards, provides something more, or something emerges from the whole because the entity as a unit displays it, and not due to its individual parts.

You might be interested in
At some point, it will occur to you that there is this oddity in the argument: most people living in a civil society never actua
Dominik [7]

There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.

If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.

On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.

3 0
4 years ago
An experimenter flashes the word heron across the visual field of a man whose corpus callosum has been severed. her is transmitt
Lena [83]
An experimenter flashes the word HERON across the visual field of a man whose corpus callosum has been severed. HER is transmitted to his right hemisphere and on to his left hemisphere. When asked to indicate what he saw, the man says he saw ON but points to HER.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did Brazil's monarchy come to and end?
pochemuha

Answer: The roots of the collapse of the monarchy can be traced as far back as 1850

Explanation: upon the death of Pedro II's youngest male child. From that point onward, the Emperor himself ceased to believe in the monarchy as a viable form of government for Brazil's future, as his remaining heir was a daughter.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is symbolic play?
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

D. when a child assimilates a concrete object into an existing schema

Explanation:

Symbolic play happens when your child starts to use objects to represent (or symbolize) other objects. Like a banana as a phone

not A becuse its not a object

8 0
3 years ago
Sam can't leave for work without going back into his house and making sure that he has taken all of his writing materials. he do
Katarina [22]
Sam is displaying: OCD obsessive compulsive disorder
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In his study of everyday "body rituals among the nacirema," horace miner:
    10·1 answer
  • Why is an important technological advance
    9·2 answers
  • How does the text develop the character of the old man, and how does this
    5·1 answer
  • In what way did the Salzburgers differ from the malcontents during the Trustee Period of Georgia history?
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me? Please and thankyouuuu :)
    12·1 answer
  • The people who moved to California to look for gold had needs (demands) but there wasn't much there which meant that most items
    11·2 answers
  • If you travel from your house at a to the park at b in 0.5 h what is your velocity
    12·2 answers
  • Critics like to point out that the theory of evolution is flawed because it is based on random changes: mutations. They say that
    6·1 answer
  • Why is the government a key part of society? If there was no government, how would this affect society? Explain your reasoning.
    12·1 answer
  • Generalpurpose money is used for most transactions in our society. How is the act of purchasing an object with money different f
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!