The sentences that best support the author's claim that Sinclair's book accomplished something different from what Sinclair had hoped are:
- But Sinclair was surprised that it was his horrific description of how meat was processed that caused the biggest uproar. (paragraph 3)
- Sinclair remarked, “I aimed at the public's heart and by accident I hit it in the stomach.” (paragraph 3)
<h3>Meaning of claim</h3>
- A claim is a belief that the author or writer of a text holds. The claim that Sinclair's book accomplished something different from what he hoped can be seen in the two statements.
- In the first one, he expressed his surprise that it was because of the horrific description that an uproar was caused. In the second sentence, he remarked that while he aimed for the public's heart, he hit their stomach.
Learn more about claims here:
brainly.com/question/14953192
I would say A because it's the odd one out, for one--B, C, and D all mention the navajo code. but art and textiles don't really do anything for a victory at least not strategically speaking
A protagonist is the main character in a story. An antagonist is a character in a story who is the chief enemy of the protagonist.
<h3>Who is the protagonist?</h3>
This is known as a person in a literary text who is the leading character that champions or advocates in a film, text or story.
Hence, we can see that an antagonist actively opposes the main character in a story.
Read more about<em> protagonist</em> here:
brainly.com/question/1410630
#SPJ2
Answer:
Antony sent Lepidus to get Caesar's will so that he could figure out ways to pay less money than Caesar promised.
Explanation:
hope it will help you