We need to see the second step of the proof, so we know what needs to be justified. It would also be nice to see the list of answer choices. I'll never understand how someone who can't answer the question and has to ask someone else can then go ahead and decide that the person helping him only needs to see parts of the question.
Answer:
The second table of values.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's put the x-values in the second table of values in correct number order:
x: -3, -2, -1, 0, 1
Now, let's write out the y-values in correct number order:
y: 1/4, 1, 4, 16, 64
Finally, let's rewrite the second table of values with the x-values in order and the corresponding y-values underneathe:
x: -3, -2, -1 0 1
y: 64, 16, 4, 1, 1/4
As it can be seen, as the x-values get bigger in value, the y-values get smaller exponentially, which is the definition of exponential decay.
I say B because if it's a square that means each side is equal...24 divided by four sides is 6 inches each
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
8, 10, 6
10 - 8 = 2
2 + 6 = 8
<em>The answer would be 1 1/5
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>48/40 = 1 8/40
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>1 8/40 Simplify to 1 1/5
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Hope this helps! </em>
PLZ GIVE ME BRAINLIEST
