All categories

4 years ago

Is the image an example of an angle?

Mathematics

2 answers:

tatiyna4 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Yes; AB and BC do not form a line and share an endpoint.

Step-by-step explanation:

I just took the test and this is the correct answer.

andrew11 [14]4 years ago

7 0

Answer:

AC. ____ 2. What is another name for line m? a. line JG c. DB b. JGB. → ... Are points B, A, D, and C coplanar? Explain. a. No; one is on plane P. b. Yes ... False; the points to not have to form right angles. d. .... Name all segments parallel to AB. a.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Evaluate this exponential expression. 3 • (5 + 4)2 – 42 = A. 345 B. 15 C. 227 D. 46

LUCKY_DIMON [66]

The answer is C. 227

5 0

3 years ago

Two major automobile manufacturers have produced compact cars with engines of the same size. We are interested in determining wh

Molodets [167]

Answer:

(A) The mean for the differences is 2.0.

(B) The test statistic is 1.617.

(C) At 90% confidence the null hypothesis should not be rejected.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a random sample of eight cars from each manufacturer is selected, and eight drivers are selected to drive each automobile for a specified distance.

The following data (in miles per gallon) show the results of the test;

Driver Manufacturer A Manufacturer B

1 32 28

2 27 22

3 26 27

4 26 24

5 25 24

6 29 25

7 31 28

8 25 27

Let $\mu_1$ = mean MPG for the fuel efficiency of Manufacturer A brand

$\mu_2$ = mean MPG for the fuel efficiency of Manufacturer B brand

SO, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $\mu_1-\mu_2=0$ or $\mu_1= \mu_2$ {means that there is a not any significant difference in the mean MPG (miles per gallon) when testing for the fuel efficiency of these two brands of automobiles}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $\mu_1-\mu_2\neq 0$ or $\mu_1\neq \mu_2$ {means that there is a significant difference in the mean MPG (miles per gallon) for the fuel efficiency of these two brands of automobiles}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviations;

T.S. = $\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ ~ $t__n__1+_n__2-2$

where, $\bar X_1$ = sample mean MPG for manufacturer A = $\frac{\sum X_A}{n_A}$ = 27.625

$\bar X_2$ = sample mean MPG for manufacturer B = $\frac{\sum X_B}{n_B}$ = 25.625

$s_1$ = sample standard deviation for manufacturer A = $\sqrt{\frac{\sum (X_A-\bar X_A)^{2} }{n_A-1} }$ = 2.72

$s_2$ = sample standard deviation manufacturer B = $\sqrt{\frac{\sum (X_B-\bar X_B)^{2} }{n_B-1} }$ = 2.20

$n_1$ = sample of cars selected from manufacturer A = 8

$n_2$ = sample of cars selected from manufacturer B = 8

Also, $s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }$ = $\sqrt{\frac{(8-1)\times 2.72^{2}+(8-1)\times 2.20^{2} }{8+8-2} }$ = 2.474

(A) The mean for the differences is = 27.625 - 25.625 = 2

(B) The test statistics = $\frac{(27.625-25.625)-(0)}{2.474 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{8} } }$ ~ $t_1_4$

= 1.617

(C) Now at 10% significance level, the t table gives critical values between -1.761 and 1.761 at 14 degree of freedom for two-tailed test. Since our test statistics lies within the range of critical values of t, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is a not any significant difference in the mean MPG (miles per gallon) when testing for the fuel efficiency of these two brands of automobiles.

5 0

4 years ago

Abbie babysits on the weekends. She charges $10 for the first hour and $6 for each

Dvinal [7]

Answer:

5 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

34-10(first hour) is 24

24/6(price per additonal hour)=4

so theres four additional hours and the one OG hour so its 5 hours total

8 0

3 years ago

Part A: Joel uses the incorrect expression 0.95(190)(0.8) to calculate that the computer will cost him a total of $144.40. Descr

notka56 [123]

Answer:

Part A) The correct Expression : (1.05)(190)(0.8)

=> The error of Joel was that instead of adding the sales tax, he subtracted it.

Part B) $159.60

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A:

To calculate the computer cost, we need to find out the selling price first.

There's a discount of 20% so the selling price will be 100% - 20% = 80% =>80/100 = 0.8

So, We'll multiply the cost price by 0.8

=> (190)(0.8)

But, there is a sales tax of 5%

So, the selling price with cost price will be:

=> 100% + 5% = 105% => 105/100 = 1.05 (We'll multiply this too with the first equation that we made above)

So, the expression will be:

=> (1.05)(190)(0.8)

The error of Joel was that instead of adding the sales tax, he subtracted it.

Part B)

Joel will pay for the tablet:

=> (1.05)(190)(0.8) [We used the above expression]

=> $159.60

6 0

3 years ago

When you bundle ten tens together they make 100, or a hundred

Ket [755]

100 is your answer!!!!!!

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers