Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Step-by-step explanation:
For this set, the correlation coefficient is = -0.015.
It shows that financial variables have trust issues. Once a price rises, the other one is decreasing the value of -0,015 shows, that there are several fewer associations in the set of data among x and y and between y values. This interaction also can range between -1 to 1, to 0 being completely unrelated. But you'd never be sure, in this situation, 0.015 is very similar to 0.
It means that your prediction is nothing better than just a wild choice. Its odds of an estimated value being relatively close to the actual result are therefore much smaller as the points are it's hardly the best match.
Answer:
Alexander is incorrect because the expressions are not equivalent.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the expression is evaluated for any value of x, y; the result will not be same.
For instance, let assume x = 1 and y = 2
3x + 4y = 3 + 4 = 7
(3)(4) + xy = (3)(4) + (1 * 2) = 12 + 2 = 14
So, the expressions are not the same and Alexander is incorrect.
The answer would be A. He should use the mean because it is in the center of the data. I hope this helped ^^
Answer:
It would be the fourth one to me Yw
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
$ 900 is the answer. as i shown in the attachment
