Answer:
(0,-7)
Step-by-step explanation:
In this question, we need to find an ordered pair of (x,y)
First we need to solve the equation for Y. It will be:
y-3=5(x-2)
y=5x-10 +3
y= 5x -7
Then, using the equation you can find the value of y using the value of x. If x= 0 the calculation will be
y= 5x-7
y= 5(0) - 7
y=-7
The ordered pair will be: (0,-7)
Fraction of black pens = 2/ (2 + 5) = 2/7 answer
Answer:
Yes, the transformation is a 270° clockwise rotation
Step-by-step explanation:
(-3, 4) ,( -4, 7) and (-2,7) transformed to (-4, - 3), (-7, -4) and (-7, -2).
Rule for 270° clockwise rotation:
(x, y) --> (- y, x)
A transformation that doesn't change the size or shape of an object.
So answer is:
Yes, the transformation is a 270° clockwise rotation
X= a number
(2x+4)/3 + (x+2)= 20
Multiply everything by 3 to eliminate the fraction
(3/1)((2x+4)/3) + (3)(x+2)= (3)(20)
2x+4+3x+6= 60
5x+10=60
Subtract 10 from both sides
5x=50
divide both sides by 5
x=10
Check:
Substitute answer in original equation
(2x+4)/3 + (x+2)= 20
(2(10)+4)/3+(10+2)= 20
(20+4)/3+12= 20
24/3+12= 20
8+12= 20
20=20
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
isn't an equivalence relation. It is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
denote a set of elements.
would denote the set of all ordered pairs of elements of
.
For example, with
,
and
are both members of
. However,
because the pairs are ordered.
A relation
on
is a subset of
. For any two elements
,
if and only if the ordered pair
is in
.
A relation
on set
is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following:
- Reflexivity: for any
, the relation
needs to ensure that
(that is:
.)
- Symmetry: for any
,
if and only if
. In other words, either both
and
are in
, or neither is in
.
- Transitivity: for any
, if
and
, then
. In other words, if
and
are both in
, then
also needs to be in
.
The relation
(on
) in this question is indeed reflexive.
,
, and
(one pair for each element of
) are all elements of
.
isn't symmetric.
but
(the pairs in
are all ordered.) In other words,
isn't equivalent to
under
even though
.
Neither is
transitive.
and
. However,
. In other words, under relation
,
and
does not imply
.